Go ad-free AND support the site for the 26-27 season for just $18. Sign up now!
Game Recap
UTA5
FinalThu, Jan 2, 2025Every game that night
CGY3

UTA beat CGY 5-3, and the chances backed it up: 4.01 expected goals to 1.87. L. Crouse led the way with 2 points (2 G, 0 A). M. Coronato had 6 shots on goal against our projection of 2.2. K. Vejmelka stopped 23 of 26.

Scoring

1st2nd3rdT
UTA1135
CGY1203
  1. 1st 8:51UTAL. Crouse0.11 xG
  2. 1st 19:12CGYB. ColemanPP0.48 xG
  3. 2nd 6:19UTAL. CooleyPP0.13 xG
  4. 2nd 7:26CGYC. Zary0.03 xG
  5. 2nd 15:14CGYB. Pachal0.17 xG
  6. 3rd 0:37UTAC. Keller0.11 xG
  7. 3rd 2:35UTAL. Crouse0.14 xG
  8. 3rd 19:00UTAK. StenlundEN0.94 xG

Team Stats

UTACGY
26Shots on goal26
4.01Expected goals1.87
48Shot attempts48
205v5 shots on goal19
1/3Power play1/4
21Hits36
16Blocked shots11
18Penalty minutes18
22Giveaways12
5Takeaways7

Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.

Expected Goals Over the Game

UTA 4.01 xGCGY 1.87 xGGoal

012341st2nd3rdUTA goal, 8:51CGY goal, 19:12UTA goal, 6:19CGY goal, 7:26CGY goal, 15:14UTA goal, 0:37UTA goal, 2:35UTA goal, 19:00

Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.

Shot Map

UTA26 on goal, 5 scored
CGY26 on goal, 3 scored

GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance

Box Score

UTA Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
C. KellerRW112301+1217:513:19
L. CrouseLW202331+2012:221:37
L. CooleyC1012010019:383:16
D. GuentherRW011211+1017:223:21
B. HaytonC011010+2016:431:47
A. KerfootC011020-1014:340:00
K. StenlundC101111-1014:310:00
N. BjugstadC011231+2211:261:37
N. SchmaltzC0002000019:523:05
J. McBainC0001400016:000:00
M. CarconeLW000100-109:211:38
L. O'BrienC000210+1106:400:00
O. MaattaD022101+2022:330:00
M. SergachevD011303+2027:142:49
I. ColeD011013+1021:230:02
M. KesselringD000141-1219:082:04
J. VälimäkiD0001010216:520:00
R. BortuzzoD000101008:250:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
K. Vejmelka26233.88559:34Win
J. Stauber000–0:00

CGY Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
B. ColemanLW1121200017:433:01
Y. SharangovichC011100+1019:013:01
M. CoronatoRW011621-1217:473:00
C. ZaryC101400+1017:233:14
N. KadriC011610-11215:302:42
M. BacklundC000010-1019:273:15
J. HuberdeauLW000010-1018:033:47
M. PospisilC000070-1017:053:24
J. PelletierLW000111+1013:230:00
K. RooneyC000031-2210:100:19
W. DuehrRW000030-209:070:10
R. LombergLW000110-206:050:10
R. AnderssonD011213-2025:573:27
M. WeegarD011172-2023:533:10
B. PachalD101221+2213:250:00
K. BahlD000030-1021:210:20
J. HanleyD0001110014:450:00
J. BeanD0000010014:280:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
D. Vladar25214.84058:32Loss
D. Wolf000–0:00

Storylines That Played Out

As Tonight had them before puck drop, with what each player did.

How We Did

We projectedIt finished
ScoreUTA 3.2, CGY 3.3UTA 5, CGY 3
Total goals6.58
Shots on goalUTA 27.5, CGY 31.9UTA 26, CGY 26
Win chanceCGY 52%UTA won

Players

PlayerSOG projectedSOGPoints projectedPointsGoal chanceGoals
CGY N. Kadri3.160.84130%0
UTA C. Keller2.430.96231%1
CGY M. Backlund2.400.52019%0
CGY B. Coleman2.310.59226%1
CGY M. Coronato2.260.53121%0
UTA D. Guenther2.220.76127%0
CGY M. Weegar2.110.51111%0
UTA L. Cooley1.920.75123%1
UTA N. Schmaltz1.920.81024%0
CGY R. Andersson1.820.48110%0
CGY J. Huberdeau1.800.81024%0
CGY Y. Sharangovich1.710.50123%0
CGY M. Pospisil1.600.42013%0
UTA M. Sergachev1.630.64110%0
CGY C. Zary1.540.50119%1
UTA M. Carcone1.510.36018%0
UTA B. Hayton1.500.42116%0
UTA M. Kesselring1.510.3507%0
UTA N. Bjugstad1.420.35116%0
UTA L. Crouse1.330.35218%2
CGY J. Pelletier1.310.31011%0
UTA A. Kerfoot1.200.42114%0
UTA K. Stenlund1.110.22113%1
CGY K. Bahl1.100.2504%0
UTA J. McBain1.010.40016%0
CGY J. Bean1.000.2105%0
CGY B. Pachal0.920.1113%1
UTA I. Cole0.900.2214%0
UTA J. Välimäki0.910.2304%0
UTA O. Maatta0.910.2425%0
UTA L. O'Brien0.820.1606%0
CGY W. Duehr0.800.21010%0
CGY K. Rooney0.800.1408%0
CGY R. Lomberg0.710.1208%0
CGY J. Hanley0.610.1303%0
UTA R. Bortuzzo0.410.0802%0

Shots on goal: 21 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.0 fewer than projected on average.

Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.