UTA beat NSH 5-2, and the chances backed it up: 3.90 expected goals to 2.88. M. Sergachev led the way with 3 points (0 G, 3 A). B. Hayton had 7 shots on goal against our projection of 1.7. K. Vejmelka stopped 27 of 29.
Scoring
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UTA | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
| NSH | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
- 1st 3:43NSHS. StamkosPP0.07 xG
- 2nd 3:00UTAC. Keller0.09 xG
- 2nd 5:13UTAM. Carcone0.05 xG
- 2nd 8:10UTAK. Yamamoto0.09 xG
- 2nd 16:39NSHJ. Marchessault0.12 xG
- 3rd 11:02UTAB. HaytonPP0.45 xG
- 3rd 18:28UTAJ. PeterkaEN0.93 xG
Team Stats
Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.
Expected Goals Over the Game
UTA 3.90 xGNSH 2.88 xGGoal
Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.
Shot Map
GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance
Box Score
UTA Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D. Guenther | RW | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | +2 | 0 | 17:06 | 2:03 |
| B. Hayton | C | 1 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15:10 | 2:05 |
| K. Yamamoto | RW | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | +2 | 2 | 14:49 | 0:00 |
| C. Keller | RW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 1 | +2 | 0 | 17:52 | 2:02 |
| M. Carcone | LW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 15:10 | 0:59 |
| J. Peterka | RW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 14:08 | 0:57 |
| N. Schmaltz | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | +2 | 2 | 19:21 | 2:08 |
| K. Stenlund | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15:41 | 0:00 |
| J. McBain | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 15:35 | 0:57 |
| L. O'Brien | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12:11 | 0:00 |
| D. But | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 11:51 | 0:54 |
| B. Tanev | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10:45 | 0:00 |
| M. Sergachev | D | 0 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 23:32 | 2:05 |
| S. Durzi | D | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | +1 | 0 | 20:14 | 1:00 |
| N. Schmidt | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 20:21 | 0:00 |
| I. Cole | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | +1 | 0 | 19:42 | 0:00 |
| J. Marino | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 18:28 | 0:00 |
| N. DeSimone | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 2 | 14:53 | 0:00 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K. Vejmelka | 29 | 27 | 2 | .931 | 60:00 | Win |
| V. Vanecek | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
NSH Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S. Stamkos | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 18:58 | 2:36 |
| J. Marchessault | RW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 17:16 | 1:11 |
| R. O'Reilly | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | -3 | 0 | 21:23 | 2:38 |
| F. Forsberg | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 18:04 | 2:37 |
| M. Bunting | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 16:39 | 0:33 |
| C. Smith | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15:51 | 0:00 |
| M. McCarron | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 15:32 | 0:00 |
| E. Haula | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 14:36 | 0:34 |
| L. Evangelista | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 14:31 | 2:01 |
| M. Wood | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 12:47 | 0:33 |
| T. Jost | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 10:37 | 0:00 |
| O. Wiesblatt | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7:26 | 0:00 |
| R. Josi | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 4 | -3 | 2 | 29:13 | 2:38 |
| B. Skjei | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 25:03 | 0:00 |
| N. Perbix | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18:15 | 0:00 |
| A. Wilsby | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 17:23 | 0:00 |
| N. Blankenburg | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | -3 | 0 | 14:41 | 0:34 |
| J. Barron | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | +1 | 0 | 10:56 | 0:00 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J. Saros | 30 | 26 | 4 | .867 | 57:47 | Loss |
| J. Annunen | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
Lines at 5-on-5
UTA
NSH
From the NHL's shift charts: the players on the ice together most at 5-on-5, with each one's own 5-on-5 time.
How We Did
| We projected | It finished | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | UTA 3.4, NSH 3.0 | UTA 5, NSH 2 |
| Total goals | 6.3 | 7 |
| Shots on goal | UTA 28.5, NSH 27.4 | UTA 30, NSH 29 |
| Win chance | UTA 55% | UTA won |
Players
| Player | SOG projected | SOG | Points projected | Points | Goal chance | Goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UTA D. Guenther | 3.1 | 2 | 0.89 | 2 | 32% | 0 |
| NSH F. Forsberg | 3.0 | 3 | 0.94 | 0 | 35% | 0 |
| NSH R. Josi | 2.8 | 4 | 0.81 | 1 | 19% | 0 |
| UTA C. Keller | 2.6 | 4 | 1.03 | 1 | 30% | 1 |
| UTA N. Schmaltz | 2.3 | 4 | 0.90 | 0 | 27% | 0 |
| NSH S. Stamkos | 2.3 | 2 | 0.83 | 1 | 35% | 1 |
| NSH L. Evangelista | 2.2 | 0 | 0.68 | 0 | 19% | 0 |
| UTA J. Peterka | 2.0 | 0 | 0.70 | 1 | 25% | 1 |
| UTA M. Carcone | 1.9 | 1 | 0.46 | 1 | 20% | 1 |
| NSH R. O'Reilly | 1.9 | 2 | 0.87 | 0 | 28% | 0 |
| NSH J. Marchessault | 1.8 | 2 | 0.51 | 1 | 24% | 1 |
| UTA M. Sergachev | 1.8 | 1 | 0.66 | 3 | 13% | 0 |
| NSH B. Skjei | 1.7 | 0 | 0.36 | 1 | 10% | 0 |
| UTA B. Hayton | 1.7 | 7 | 0.44 | 2 | 16% | 1 |
| NSH M. Bunting | 1.7 | 1 | 0.49 | 0 | 20% | 0 |
| NSH E. Haula | 1.5 | 0 | 0.39 | 0 | 16% | 0 |
| UTA S. Durzi | 1.5 | 2 | 0.45 | 2 | 10% | 0 |
| UTA D. But | 1.4 | 0 | 0.32 | 0 | 13% | 0 |
| UTA J. McBain | 1.4 | 0 | 0.37 | 0 | 14% | 0 |
| NSH M. McCarron | 1.3 | 1 | 0.22 | 0 | 10% | 0 |
| NSH C. Smith | 1.2 | 4 | 0.24 | 0 | 11% | 0 |
| NSH M. Wood | 1.2 | 2 | 0.28 | 0 | 13% | 0 |
| NSH N. Blankenburg | 1.1 | 1 | 0.28 | 0 | 7% | 0 |
| NSH A. Wilsby | 1.1 | 2 | 0.20 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| UTA N. Schmidt | 1.1 | 1 | 0.34 | 0 | 7% | 0 |
| UTA K. Stenlund | 1.1 | 1 | 0.30 | 0 | 13% | 0 |
| NSH T. Jost | 1.0 | 1 | 0.21 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
| NSH N. Perbix | 0.9 | 2 | 0.23 | 0 | 6% | 0 |
| UTA K. Yamamoto | 0.9 | 1 | 0.27 | 2 | 11% | 1 |
| UTA N. DeSimone | 0.9 | 0 | 0.19 | 0 | 5% | 0 |
| UTA L. O'Brien | 0.9 | 2 | 0.14 | 0 | 5% | 0 |
| UTA J. Marino | 0.8 | 1 | 0.39 | 0 | 5% | 0 |
| NSH O. Wiesblatt | 0.7 | 1 | 0.17 | 0 | 7% | 0 |
| UTA B. Tanev | 0.7 | 3 | 0.16 | 0 | 8% | 0 |
| NSH J. Barron | 0.7 | 1 | 0.15 | 0 | 5% | 0 |
| UTA I. Cole | 0.7 | 0 | 0.23 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
Shots on goal: 21 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.1 more than projected on average.
Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.