UTA beat VAN 4-1 despite fewer good chances: 2.22 expected goals to 3.56. VAN outshot UTA 33 to 18. K. Stenlund led the way with 2 points (1 G, 1 A). E. Pettersson had 5 shots on goal against our projection of 1.9. K. Vejmelka stopped 32 of 33.
Team Stats
Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.
Expected Goals Over the Game
UTA 2.22 xGVAN 3.56 xGGoal
Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.
Shot Map
GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance
Box Score
UTA Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K. Stenlund | C | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | +2 | 4 | 14:08 | 0:10 |
| N. Schmaltz | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 17:45 | 0:35 |
| J. Peterka | RW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 17:08 | 1:38 |
| J. McBain | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15:41 | 0:00 |
| C. Keller | RW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 15:19 | 1:38 |
| D. Guenther | RW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 14:52 | 1:42 |
| K. Yamamoto | RW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 11:06 | 0:00 |
| L. Crouse | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 17:13 | 0:30 |
| L. Cooley | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16:47 | 1:33 |
| M. Carcone | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 12:57 | 0:31 |
| D. But | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11:57 | 0:00 |
| L. O'Brien | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8:51 | 0:00 |
| M. Sergachev | D | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | +1 | 2 | 23:53 | 1:50 |
| J. Marino | D | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | +3 | 0 | 22:54 | 0:00 |
| N. Schmidt | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 19:37 | 0:35 |
| I. Cole | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | +2 | 0 | 19:01 | 0:00 |
| S. Durzi | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 18:31 | 0:23 |
| M. Lamoureux | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 14:39 | 0:00 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K. Vejmelka | 33 | 32 | 1 | .970 | 60:00 | Win |
| V. Vanecek | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
VAN Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J. Lekkerimäki | RW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11:59 | 3:13 |
| A. Bains | LW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 9:23 | 0:36 |
| A. Räty | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 9:01 | 0:36 |
| C. Garland | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 22:41 | 2:55 |
| E. Pettersson | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 3 | -3 | 0 | 21:47 | 4:31 |
| B. Boeser | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 19:47 | 4:30 |
| J. DeBrusk | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 19:38 | 4:34 |
| D. Kampf | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16:07 | 0:00 |
| K. Sherwood | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14:07 | 0:35 |
| D. O'Connor | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 12:49 | 0:38 |
| L. Karlsson | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 2 | 12:43 | 0:29 |
| M. Sasson | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 11:27 | 0:02 |
| Q. Hughes | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 2 | -3 | 2 | 29:29 | 4:41 |
| F. Hronek | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 24:34 | 0:34 |
| M. Pettersson | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 17:41 | 0:02 |
| T. Myers | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 17:24 | 0:00 |
| T. Willander | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 13:53 | 0:58 |
| E. Pettersson | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 12:41 | 0:36 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K. Lankinen | 17 | 14 | 3 | .824 | 58:36 | Loss |
| N. Tolopilo | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
Lines at 5-on-5
UTA
VAN
From the NHL's shift charts: the players on the ice together most at 5-on-5, with each one's own 5-on-5 time.
How We Did
| We projected | It finished | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | UTA 3.2, VAN 2.9 | UTA 4, VAN 1 |
| Total goals | 6.1 | 5 |
| Shots on goal | UTA 28.6, VAN 24.9 | UTA 18, VAN 33 |
| Win chance | UTA 54% | UTA won |
Players
| Player | SOG projected | SOG | Points projected | Points | Goal chance | Goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UTA D. Guenther | 2.8 | 0 | 0.77 | 1 | 27% | 0 |
| VAN Q. Hughes | 2.7 | 4 | 1.07 | 0 | 15% | 0 |
| UTA C. Keller | 2.7 | 1 | 0.96 | 1 | 29% | 0 |
| VAN C. Garland | 2.4 | 3 | 0.71 | 0 | 26% | 0 |
| VAN J. DeBrusk | 2.3 | 5 | 0.61 | 0 | 29% | 0 |
| VAN B. Boeser | 2.2 | 2 | 0.78 | 0 | 32% | 0 |
| UTA J. Peterka | 2.1 | 1 | 0.72 | 1 | 25% | 0 |
| UTA N. Schmaltz | 2.0 | 1 | 0.74 | 1 | 23% | 1 |
| VAN K. Sherwood | 2.0 | 4 | 0.60 | 0 | 25% | 0 |
| VAN E. Pettersson | 1.9 | 5 | 0.93 | 0 | 31% | 0 |
| UTA L. Crouse | 1.8 | 2 | 0.44 | 0 | 21% | 0 |
| UTA M. Sergachev | 1.8 | 1 | 0.62 | 2 | 12% | 1 |
| UTA L. Cooley | 1.8 | 2 | 0.68 | 0 | 24% | 0 |
| UTA M. Carcone | 1.7 | 1 | 0.40 | 0 | 17% | 0 |
| VAN F. Hronek | 1.4 | 2 | 0.52 | 0 | 8% | 0 |
| VAN L. Karlsson | 1.4 | 1 | 0.35 | 0 | 15% | 0 |
| UTA S. Durzi | 1.4 | 0 | 0.41 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
| UTA N. Schmidt | 1.2 | 0 | 0.36 | 0 | 7% | 0 |
| VAN D. O'Connor | 1.2 | 0 | 0.34 | 0 | 15% | 0 |
| UTA J. McBain | 1.2 | 0 | 0.34 | 1 | 13% | 0 |
| VAN T. Myers | 1.1 | 0 | 0.28 | 0 | 5% | 0 |
| UTA K. Stenlund | 1.1 | 3 | 0.29 | 2 | 13% | 1 |
| UTA M. Lamoureux | 1.1 | 1 | 0.24 | 0 | 5% | 0 |
| UTA L. O'Brien | 1.1 | 1 | 0.16 | 0 | 6% | 0 |
| VAN J. Lekkerimäki | 1.0 | 0 | 0.28 | 1 | 13% | 0 |
| VAN M. Sasson | 1.0 | 0 | 0.27 | 0 | 14% | 0 |
| UTA K. Yamamoto | 0.9 | 0 | 0.28 | 1 | 12% | 0 |
| VAN D. Kampf | 0.9 | 1 | 0.26 | 0 | 10% | 0 |
| VAN M. Pettersson | 0.8 | 2 | 0.30 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| VAN A. Räty | 0.8 | 1 | 0.28 | 1 | 12% | 0 |
| UTA J. Marino | 0.8 | 2 | 0.34 | 1 | 4% | 1 |
| UTA I. Cole | 0.8 | 0 | 0.24 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| VAN T. Willander | 0.7 | 1 | 0.27 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
| VAN E. Pettersson | 0.6 | 1 | 0.10 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
| VAN A. Bains | 0.5 | 1 | 0.11 | 1 | 5% | 1 |
Shots on goal: 18 of 35 players within one of their projection; they took 0.1 fewer than projected on average.
Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.