Go ad-free AND support the site for the 26-27 season for just $18. Sign up now!
Game Recap
VAN1
CGY3
CGY beat VAN 3-1, and the chances backed it up: 4.01 expected goals to 2.08. J. Huberdeau led the way with 2 points (1 G, 1 A). J. Miller had 5 shots on goal against our projection of 1.9. D. Wolf stopped 23 of 24.
Scoring
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VAN | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| CGY | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
- 1st 14:31CGYC. Zary0.56 xG
- 3rd 6:15VANB. BoeserPP0.09 xG
- 3rd 9:18CGYN. Kadri0.13 xG
- 3rd 18:58CGYJ. HuberdeauEN0.41 xG
Team Stats
VANCGY
24Shots on goal29
2.08Expected goals4.01
47Shot attempts62
185v5 shots on goal26
1/2Power play0/2
29Hits28
16Blocked shots11
25Penalty minutes25
10Giveaways15
4Takeaways6
Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.
Expected Goals Over the Game
VAN 2.08 xGCGY 4.01 xGGoal
Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.
Shot Map
GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance
Box Score
VAN Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B. Boeser | RW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 18:17 | 1:58 |
| J. Miller | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 17:36 | 2:24 |
| C. Garland | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | -2 | 0 | 20:07 | 1:56 |
| P. Suter | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 19:27 | 0:42 |
| J. DeBrusk | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 16:57 | 1:57 |
| D. Heinen | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 16:11 | 0:41 |
| T. Blueger | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 15:36 | 0:00 |
| K. Sherwood | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 14:16 | 0:26 |
| D. Joshua | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 11:59 | 0:14 |
| N. Hoglander | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9:49 | 0:00 |
| M. Sasson | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8:49 | 0:00 |
| P. Di Giuseppe | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8:29 | 0:00 |
| E. Brannstrom | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | -1 | 5 | 17:40 | 1:48 |
| T. Myers | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 23:33 | 0:14 |
| C. Soucy | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | -2 | 0 | 21:33 | 0:50 |
| N. Juulsen | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 4 | 19:24 | 0:00 |
| D. Forbort | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 18:01 | 0:00 |
| V. Desharnais | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | -1 | 2 | 16:15 | 0:00 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K. Lankinen | 28 | 26 | 2 | .929 | 58:01 | Loss |
| T. Demko | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
CGY Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J. Huberdeau | LW | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | +2 | 0 | 18:09 | 1:24 |
| N. Kadri | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 0 | +2 | 0 | 19:45 | 2:13 |
| Y. Sharangovich | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 15:18 | 1:35 |
| C. Zary | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 14:30 | 0:30 |
| M. Pospisil | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 14:19 | 1:14 |
| J. Pelletier | LW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 12:16 | 0:00 |
| M. Coronato | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | +1 | 0 | 19:39 | 1:29 |
| B. Coleman | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 19:26 | 1:19 |
| M. Backlund | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 18:06 | 1:06 |
| K. Rooney | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9:10 | 0:00 |
| W. Duehr | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7:48 | 0:00 |
| R. Lomberg | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 7:21 | 0:00 |
| R. Andersson | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 24:52 | 2:20 |
| K. Bahl | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 22:49 | 0:00 |
| M. Weegar | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 1 | +3 | 2 | 20:54 | 0:00 |
| J. Hanley | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +3 | 0 | 20:21 | 0:00 |
| J. Bean | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 14:39 | 0:25 |
| B. Pachal | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14:00 | 0:00 |
How We Did
| We projected | It finished | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | VAN 3.2, CGY 3.2 | VAN 1, CGY 3 |
| Total goals | 6.3 | 4 |
| Shots on goal | VAN 25.6, CGY 30.3 | VAN 24, CGY 29 |
| Win chance | CGY 50% | CGY won |
Players
| Player | SOG projected | SOG | Points projected | Points | Goal chance | Goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGY N. Kadri | 3.1 | 5 | 0.85 | 1 | 28% | 1 |
| CGY M. Backlund | 2.5 | 0 | 0.55 | 0 | 19% | 0 |
| VAN C. Garland | 2.4 | 2 | 0.77 | 0 | 25% | 0 |
| CGY B. Coleman | 2.3 | 1 | 0.60 | 0 | 25% | 0 |
| CGY M. Coronato | 2.2 | 2 | 0.55 | 0 | 20% | 0 |
| CGY M. Weegar | 2.0 | 3 | 0.53 | 0 | 14% | 0 |
| VAN J. DeBrusk | 1.9 | 3 | 0.62 | 0 | 27% | 0 |
| VAN B. Boeser | 1.9 | 5 | 0.78 | 1 | 30% | 1 |
| VAN J. Miller | 1.9 | 5 | 0.97 | 1 | 27% | 0 |
| CGY J. Huberdeau | 1.8 | 1 | 0.83 | 2 | 23% | 1 |
| CGY Y. Sharangovich | 1.8 | 2 | 0.52 | 1 | 22% | 0 |
| CGY R. Andersson | 1.7 | 1 | 0.48 | 0 | 13% | 0 |
| CGY M. Pospisil | 1.7 | 0 | 0.44 | 1 | 13% | 0 |
| VAN K. Sherwood | 1.7 | 1 | 0.47 | 0 | 20% | 0 |
| VAN P. Suter | 1.6 | 0 | 0.45 | 0 | 19% | 0 |
| CGY C. Zary | 1.5 | 3 | 0.51 | 1 | 18% | 1 |
| CGY J. Pelletier | 1.2 | 4 | 0.30 | 1 | 11% | 0 |
| VAN T. Blueger | 1.2 | 1 | 0.40 | 0 | 11% | 0 |
| VAN M. Sasson | 1.1 | 2 | 0.38 | 0 | 11% | 0 |
| VAN D. Heinen | 1.1 | 0 | 0.41 | 0 | 16% | 0 |
| VAN P. Giuseppe | 1.1 | 2 | 0.26 | 0 | 12% | 0 |
| VAN C. Soucy | 1.0 | 1 | 0.24 | 0 | 6% | 0 |
| CGY K. Bahl | 1.0 | 1 | 0.25 | 0 | 5% | 0 |
| VAN T. Myers | 1.0 | 0 | 0.26 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
| VAN N. Hoglander | 1.0 | 1 | 0.28 | 0 | 14% | 0 |
| CGY J. Bean | 0.9 | 2 | 0.22 | 0 | 7% | 0 |
| VAN E. Brannstrom | 0.9 | 1 | 0.22 | 1 | 3% | 0 |
| CGY B. Pachal | 0.9 | 1 | 0.11 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| CGY W. Duehr | 0.8 | 1 | 0.23 | 0 | 10% | 0 |
| CGY K. Rooney | 0.8 | 1 | 0.15 | 0 | 8% | 0 |
| VAN D. Joshua | 0.7 | 0 | 0.35 | 0 | 16% | 0 |
| CGY R. Lomberg | 0.7 | 1 | 0.13 | 0 | 7% | 0 |
| VAN N. Juulsen | 0.6 | 0 | 0.11 | 0 | 2% | 0 |
| VAN D. Forbort | 0.6 | 0 | 0.16 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| CGY J. Hanley | 0.6 | 0 | 0.12 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| VAN V. Desharnais | 0.5 | 0 | 0.13 | 0 | 1% | 0 |
Shots on goal: 24 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.1 more than projected on average.
Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.