Go ad-free AND support the site for the 26-27 season for just $18. Sign up now!
NHL Scores and Recaps

13 games

BOS1
WSH3
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
BOS1001
WSH2013
3.26Expected goals4.55
27Shots on goal27
83Shot attempts66
  1. A. Protas WSH2 G, 5 SOG
  2. T. Wilson WSH2 A, 5 SOG
  3. J. Chychrun WSH1 G, 4 SOG

L. Thompson WSH26 saves on 27, the win

We had BOS at 50% to win; WSH won. Shots on goal: 18 of 36 players within one of their projection.

NYI1
TOR3
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
NYI0101
TOR1113
2.67Expected goals3.26
31Shots on goal25
61Shot attempts54
  1. W. Nylander TOR2 A, 4 SOG
  2. J. Pageau NYI1 G, 5 SOG
  3. J. Tavares TOR1 G, 1 SOG

J. Woll TOR30 saves on 31, the win

We had TOR at 57% to win, and they did. Shots on goal: 19 of 36 players within one of their projection.

MTL3
VGK2
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
MTL0123
VGK2002
2.20Expected goals2.61
22Shots on goal29
49Shot attempts57
  1. C. Caufield MTL1 G, 4 SOG
  2. K. Dach MTL1 G, 3 SOG
  3. N. Hanifin VGK1 G, 2 SOG

S. Montembeault MTL27 saves on 29, the win

We had VGK at 66% to win; MTL won. Shots on goal: 21 of 36 players within one of their projection.

STL6
CHI2
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
STL2316
CHI1012
3.63Expected goals2.75
28Shots on goal30
54Shot attempts54
  1. J. Faulk STL1 G, 2 A, 3 SOG
  2. C. Fowler STL2 G, 2 SOG
  3. D. Holloway STL1 G, 1 A, 3 SOG

J. Binnington STL28 saves on 30, the win

We had STL at 59% to win, and they did. Shots on goal: 24 of 36 players within one of their projection.

PIT2
DET4
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
PIT1012
DET1124
2.52Expected goals3.88
25Shots on goal25
54Shot attempts55
  1. D. O'Connor PIT2 G, 4 SOG
  2. J. Compher DET1 G, 1 A, 4 SOG
  3. J. Berggren DET1 G, 1 A, 1 SOG

A. Lyon DET23 saves on 25, the win

We had DET at 51% to win, and they did. Shots on goal: 19 of 36 players within one of their projection.

CAR3
CBJ4
Final/SO
Team1st2nd3rdSOT
CAR12003
CBJ20114
3.18Expected goals2.08
35Shots on goal28
75Shot attempts50
  1. S. Monahan CBJ3 A, 1 SOG
  2. K. Marchenko CBJ2 G, 5 SOG
  3. D. Voronkov CBJ1 G, 1 A, 4 SOG

E. Merzlikins CBJ32 saves on 35, the win

We had CAR at 62% to win; CBJ won. Shots on goal: 20 of 35 players within one of their projection.

BUF2
DAL4
Final
2.68Expected goals4.13
23Shots on goal33
46Shot attempts70
  1. J. Robertson DAL1 G, 2 A, 2 SOG
  2. T. Harley DAL2 A, 1 SOG
  3. J. Zucker BUF1 G, 4 SOG

C. DeSmith DAL21 saves on 23, the win

We had DAL at 65% to win, and they did. Shots on goal: 21 of 35 players within one of their projection.

NSH3
MIN5
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
NSH2103
MIN1315
4.19Expected goals3.09
46Shots on goal38
74Shot attempts60
  1. M. Rossi MIN2 G, 1 A, 7 SOG
  2. J. Brodin MIN1 G, 1 A, 4 SOG
  3. M. Zuccarello MIN1 G, 1 A, 1 SOG

F. Gustavsson MIN43 saves on 46, the win

We had MIN at 59% to win, and they did. Shots on goal: 20 of 36 players within one of their projection.

WPG2
COL5
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
WPG0202
COL1135
2.66Expected goals3.56
22Shots on goal38
52Shot attempts67
  1. J. Manson COL2 A, 3 SOG
  2. J. Drouin COL2 A, 0 SOG
  3. M. Rantanen COL1 G, 5 SOG

M. Blackwood COL20 saves on 22, the win

We had COL at 57% to win, and they did. Shots on goal: 15 of 35 players within one of their projection.

NJD2
ANA3
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
NJD0022
ANA1023
3.15Expected goals2.85
34Shots on goal26
75Shot attempts48
  1. R. Strome ANA1 G, 1 A, 2 SOG
  2. F. Vatrano ANA2 A, 2 SOG
  3. T. Terry ANA1 G, 4 SOG

L. Dostal ANA32 saves on 34, the win

We had NJD at 60% to win; ANA won. Shots on goal: 21 of 36 players within one of their projection.

PHI4
SJS0
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
PHI1214
SJS0000
3.15Expected goals1.75
34Shots on goal22
60Shot attempts53
  1. E. Zamula PHI1 G, 1 A, 2 SOG
  2. B. Brink PHI2 A, 2 SOG
  3. J. Drysdale PHI2 A, 1 SOG

S. Ersson PHI15 saves on 15, the win

We had PHI at 56% to win, and they did. Shots on goal: 20 of 36 players within one of their projection.

VAN1
CGY3
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
VAN0011
CGY1023
2.08Expected goals4.01
24Shots on goal29
47Shot attempts62
  1. J. Huberdeau CGY1 G, 1 A, 1 SOG
  2. N. Kadri CGY1 G, 5 SOG
  3. B. Boeser VAN1 G, 5 SOG

D. Wolf CGY23 saves on 24, the win

We had CGY at 50% to win, and they did. Shots on goal: 24 of 36 players within one of their projection.

UTA1
EDM4
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
UTA1001
EDM1214
2.33Expected goals4.31
27Shots on goal38
54Shot attempts65
  1. M. Ekholm EDM1 G, 1 A, 2 SOG
  2. C. McDavid EDM2 A, 2 SOG
  3. C. Brown EDM2 A, 0 SOG

S. Skinner EDM26 saves on 27, the win

We had EDM at 67% to win, and they did. Shots on goal: 21 of 36 players within one of their projection.