PIT beat VAN 5-4, and the chances backed it up: 2.89 expected goals to 1.57. B. Rust led the way with 3 points (2 G, 1 A). B. Rust had 7 shots on goal against our projection of 2.6. T. Jarry stopped 25 of 29.
Scoring
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VAN | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| PIT | 4 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
- 1st 3:59PITB. Lizotte0.07 xG
- 1st 8:52VANA. Räty0.10 xG
- 1st 12:53PITR. Rakell0.14 xG
- 1st 15:14PITK. HayesPP0.29 xG
- 1st 17:41PITB. Rust0.14 xG
- 2nd 3:40PITB. Rust0.07 xG
- 2nd 13:40VANP. Suter0.03 xG
- 3rd 0:40VANQ. Hughes0.14 xG
- 3rd 18:14VANE. Pettersson0.03 xG
Team Stats
Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.
Expected Goals Over the Game
VAN 1.57 xGPIT 2.89 xGGoal
Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.
Shot Map
GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance
Box Score
VAN Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E. Pettersson | C | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17:17 | 1:01 |
| C. Garland | RW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 19:41 | 1:11 |
| P. Suter | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17:09 | 0:59 |
| A. Räty | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | +1 | 4 | 11:06 | 0:00 |
| M. Sasson | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 9:56 | 0:00 |
| B. Boeser | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 16:59 | 1:14 |
| K. Sherwood | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 16:40 | 0:46 |
| J. DeBrusk | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 16:28 | 1:02 |
| D. Joshua | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 14:10 | 0:58 |
| D. Heinen | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 13:43 | 0:00 |
| T. Blueger | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | -1 | 0 | 12:59 | 0:00 |
| N. Hoglander | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 9:14 | 0:00 |
| Q. Hughes | D | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | +2 | 0 | 27:35 | 1:23 |
| F. Hronek | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | +2 | 0 | 25:50 | 0:49 |
| C. Soucy | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 17:34 | 0:00 |
| T. Myers | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 2 | 17:30 | 0:00 |
| E. Brannstrom | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 16:57 | 0:37 |
| N. Juulsen | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 13:44 | 0:00 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A. Silovs | 23 | 18 | 5 | .783 | 57:48 | Loss |
| K. Lankinen | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
PIT Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B. Rust | RW | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 2 | 0 | +2 | 0 | 18:36 | 4:28 |
| S. Crosby | C | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | +3 | 0 | 19:55 | 5:19 |
| E. Malkin | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 18:45 | 4:49 |
| R. Rakell | RW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | +2 | 0 | 18:32 | 4:29 |
| B. Lizotte | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 13:51 | 0:12 |
| D. O'Connor | LW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | +1 | 0 | 12:16 | 0:02 |
| K. Hayes | RW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 10:30 | 2:10 |
| P. Tomasino | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 18:05 | 3:09 |
| M. Bunting | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17:49 | 2:51 |
| N. Acciari | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -2 | 0 | 11:53 | 0:00 |
| A. Beauvillier | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11:20 | 0:00 |
| M. Nieto | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -2 | 0 | 10:48 | 0:00 |
| E. Karlsson | D | 0 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 19:46 | 4:34 |
| M. Pettersson | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | 21:15 | 0:15 |
| R. Shea | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | +1 | 0 | 18:38 | 0:12 |
| K. Letang | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | -1 | 0 | 23:16 | 3:08 |
| J. St. Ivany | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | +1 | 2 | 17:11 | 0:03 |
| M. Grzelcyk | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 15:34 | 2:39 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T. Jarry | 29 | 25 | 4 | .862 | 60:00 | Win |
| A. Nedeljkovic | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
Storylines That Played Out
As Tonight had them before puck drop, with what each player did.
How We Did
| We projected | It finished | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | VAN 3.0, PIT 3.1 | VAN 4, PIT 5 |
| Total goals | 6.0 | 9 |
| Shots on goal | VAN 26.9, PIT 30.4 | VAN 29, PIT 23 |
| Win chance | PIT 52% | PIT won |
Players
| Player | SOG projected | SOG | Points projected | Points | Goal chance | Goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIT S. Crosby | 2.9 | 0 | 1.10 | 2 | 33% | 0 |
| VAN C. Garland | 2.7 | 2 | 0.78 | 1 | 25% | 0 |
| PIT B. Rust | 2.6 | 7 | 0.76 | 3 | 28% | 2 |
| PIT R. Rakell | 2.5 | 1 | 0.68 | 1 | 26% | 1 |
| PIT E. Karlsson | 2.4 | 2 | 0.71 | 3 | 18% | 0 |
| PIT E. Malkin | 2.3 | 1 | 0.90 | 1 | 28% | 0 |
| VAN E. Pettersson | 2.2 | 2 | 0.92 | 2 | 30% | 1 |
| VAN Q. Hughes | 2.1 | 3 | 0.89 | 3 | 11% | 1 |
| VAN J. DeBrusk | 2.1 | 3 | 0.62 | 0 | 26% | 0 |
| VAN K. Sherwood | 2.0 | 1 | 0.54 | 0 | 20% | 0 |
| PIT K. Letang | 2.0 | 0 | 0.54 | 0 | 14% | 0 |
| VAN B. Boeser | 1.9 | 2 | 0.68 | 0 | 26% | 0 |
| PIT M. Bunting | 1.8 | 0 | 0.57 | 0 | 20% | 0 |
| PIT A. Beauvillier | 1.8 | 0 | 0.39 | 0 | 15% | 0 |
| PIT D. O'Connor | 1.8 | 2 | 0.39 | 1 | 17% | 0 |
| VAN P. Suter | 1.7 | 3 | 0.43 | 1 | 19% | 1 |
| VAN F. Hronek | 1.5 | 2 | 0.52 | 1 | 8% | 0 |
| PIT P. Tomasino | 1.3 | 1 | 0.41 | 0 | 13% | 0 |
| VAN D. Heinen | 1.3 | 2 | 0.45 | 0 | 18% | 0 |
| PIT N. Acciari | 1.2 | 0 | 0.25 | 0 | 14% | 0 |
| PIT M. Pettersson | 1.2 | 0 | 0.38 | 1 | 5% | 0 |
| VAN T. Blueger | 1.2 | 4 | 0.40 | 0 | 11% | 0 |
| PIT K. Hayes | 1.2 | 3 | 0.29 | 1 | 11% | 1 |
| VAN T. Myers | 1.1 | 0 | 0.29 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| PIT M. Nieto | 1.1 | 1 | 0.25 | 0 | 10% | 0 |
| PIT M. Grzelcyk | 1.1 | 1 | 0.28 | 0 | 5% | 0 |
| VAN N. Hoglander | 1.1 | 0 | 0.29 | 0 | 14% | 0 |
| VAN E. Brannstrom | 1.0 | 1 | 0.28 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| VAN D. Joshua | 1.0 | 0 | 0.44 | 0 | 18% | 0 |
| VAN C. Soucy | 1.0 | 1 | 0.23 | 0 | 7% | 0 |
| PIT B. Lizotte | 0.9 | 2 | 0.25 | 1 | 10% | 1 |
| VAN A. Räty | 0.9 | 1 | 0.21 | 1 | 10% | 1 |
| PIT J. Ivany | 0.8 | 1 | 0.12 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| VAN N. Juulsen | 0.7 | 1 | 0.13 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
| PIT R. Shea | 0.6 | 1 | 0.08 | 1 | 5% | 0 |
Shots on goal: 18 of 35 players within one of their projection; they took 0.1 fewer than projected on average.
Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.