Go ad-free AND support the site for the 26-27 season for just $18. Sign up now!
Game Recap
VGK4
FinalTue, Jan 7, 2025Every game that night
SJS2

VGK beat SJS 4-2, and the chances backed it up: 5.22 expected goals to 1.70. VGK outshot SJS 42 to 21. M. Stone led the way with 2 points (1 G, 1 A). M. Stone had 6 shots on goal against our projection of 2.0. I. Samsonov stopped 19 of 21.

Scoring

1st2nd3rdT
VGK2024
SJS0112
  1. 1st 8:39VGKM. Stone0.18 xG
  2. 1st 10:08VGKZ. Whitecloud0.09 xG
  3. 2nd 9:49SJSW. EklundPP0.18 xG
  4. 3rd 1:10VGKV. OlofssonPP0.18 xG
  5. 3rd 10:41SJST. LiljegrenPP0.06 xG
  6. 3rd 18:40VGKT. HertlEN0.84 xG

Team Stats

VGKSJS
42Shots on goal21
5.22Expected goals1.70
78Shot attempts48
355v5 shots on goal17
1/1Power play2/2
25Hits28
19Blocked shots15
4Penalty minutes2
14Giveaways9
5Takeaways4

Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.

Expected Goals Over the Game

VGK 5.22 xGSJS 1.70 xGGoal

0123451st2nd3rdVGK goal, 8:39VGK goal, 10:08SJS goal, 9:49VGK goal, 1:10SJS goal, 10:41VGK goal, 18:40

Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.

Shot Map

VGK41 on goal, 4 scored
SJS21 on goal, 2 scored

GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance

Box Score

VGK Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
M. StoneRW112613+2018:261:13
J. EichelC011300+2020:491:13
B. HowdenC011220+1016:380:00
W. KarlssonC0110110015:460:03
V. OlofssonLW101600+1215:391:13
K. KolesarRW0111100+1015:250:00
T. HertlC101420+1215:121:13
T. PearsonLW000223+1016:260:00
P. DorofeyevRW0003210013:470:00
C. SchwindtRW0002210010:090:00
A. HoltzRW0001020010:080:00
J. RondbjergRW000101009:510:00
S. TheodoreD022200+1019:561:13
Z. WhitecloudD101201+1016:020:00
A. PietrangeloD000202+1023:450:00
N. HanifinD000220+2021:530:00
B. McNabbD0000110021:010:00
N. HagueD000303+1016:210:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
I. Samsonov21192.90559:57Win
A. Hill000–0:00

SJS Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
W. EklundLW112500-1019:131:49
F. ZetterlundLW011112-1220:462:17
C. GrafRW011212-1016:441:38
A. WennbergC011110-2015:401:47
M. GranlundC000112-1020:141:02
M. CelebriniC000101-2018:001:00
W. SmithC000101-1015:370:32
T. ToffoliC000100-2013:311:11
L. KuninC0003400012:260:00
B. GoodrowC0002510012:190:00
N. KovalenkoRW0001300011:430:00
K. KostinC000040-109:200:00
T. LiljegrenD1011410020:082:30
H. ThrunD000001-1023:440:00
M. FerraroD0000200019:400:00
C. CeciD000023-1019:190:00
J. RuttaD000000-1017:500:00
S. MukhamadullinD000101-1013:520:19
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
A. Georgiev41383.92758:41Loss
Y. Askarov000–0:00

Storylines That Played Out

  • Old teamTomas Hertl VGK Faces SJS, his team until Jan 20241 G, 4 SOG

As Tonight had them before puck drop, with what each player did.

How We Did

We projectedIt finished
ScoreVGK 3.9, SJS 2.6VGK 4, SJS 2
Total goals6.56
Shots on goalVGK 33.4, SJS 27.0VGK 42, SJS 21
Win chanceVGK 69%VGK won

Players

PlayerSOG projectedSOGPoints projectedPointsGoal chanceGoals
VGK J. Eichel3.531.24135%0
SJS M. Celebrini2.910.78026%0
VGK P. Dorofeyev2.630.60029%0
SJS T. Toffoli2.510.61028%0
VGK W. Karlsson2.400.78127%0
VGK A. Pietrangelo2.220.63011%0
SJS M. Granlund2.110.78018%0
VGK V. Olofsson2.160.65130%1
VGK T. Hertl2.140.68125%1
VGK N. Hanifin2.120.64013%0
SJS F. Zetterlund2.010.51120%0
VGK M. Stone2.061.05230%1
VGK S. Theodore1.920.73211%0
VGK T. Pearson1.520.44016%0
VGK B. Howden1.520.46121%0
SJS W. Eklund1.450.55216%1
SJS W. Smith1.410.43017%0
SJS L. Kunin1.430.33016%0
VGK N. Hague1.330.2106%0
VGK K. Kolesar1.310.42117%0
VGK B. McNabb1.300.3005%0
VGK A. Holtz1.110.27013%0
SJS A. Wennberg1.110.40115%0
SJS T. Liljegren1.110.2616%1
SJS C. Ceci1.100.2605%0
SJS S. Mukhamadullin1.110.1905%0
SJS C. Graf1.020.36113%0
SJS M. Ferraro1.000.1804%0
SJS K. Kostin1.000.34016%0
VGK J. Rondbjerg1.010.1607%0
SJS B. Goodrow0.920.22011%0
VGK Z. Whitecloud0.920.2317%1
SJS J. Rutta0.900.1904%0
SJS H. Thrun0.900.2104%0
SJS N. Kovalenko0.910.33012%0
VGK C. Schwindt0.720.2006%0

Shots on goal: 19 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.2 more than projected on average.

Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.