ANA beat WPG 4-1, and the chances backed it up: 3.20 expected goals to 2.32. L. Carlsson led the way with 2 points (2 G, 0 A). K. Connor had 6 shots on goal against our projection of 3.4. L. Dostal stopped 23 of 24.
Scoring
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WPG | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| ANA | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
- 1st 7:18ANAB. Sennecke0.23 xG
- 1st 19:03ANAL. CarlssonPP0.14 xG
- 2nd 4:22WPGK. Connor0.16 xG
- 2nd 11:48ANAB. Sennecke0.36 xG
- 3rd 2:47ANAL. CarlssonPP0.11 xG
Team Stats
Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.
Expected Goals Over the Game
WPG 2.32 xGANA 3.20 xGGoal
Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.
Shot Map
GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance
Box Score
WPG Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K. Connor | LW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 22:00 | 4:25 |
| M. Scheifele | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 20:24 | 4:22 |
| C. Perfetti | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 17:59 | 4:17 |
| G. Vilardi | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 17:31 | 4:14 |
| J. Toews | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 17:11 | 3:21 |
| V. Namestnikov | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 16:15 | 3:17 |
| A. Iafallo | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15:36 | 3:24 |
| N. Niederreiter | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14:38 | 3:26 |
| A. Lowry | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14:10 | 0:16 |
| P. Ford | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11:04 | 0:19 |
| T. Pearson | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8:42 | 0:15 |
| N. Chibrikov | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6:09 | 0:00 |
| J. Morrissey | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 23:08 | 4:20 |
| N. Pionk | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 22:57 | 3:46 |
| D. DeMelo | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | -1 | 2 | 19:06 | 0:13 |
| L. Stanley | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 18:07 | 0:00 |
| L. Schenn | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 14:48 | 0:00 |
| H. Fleury | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 14:27 | 0:05 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E. Comrie | 21 | 17 | 4 | .810 | 60:00 | Loss |
| C. Hellebuyck | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
ANA Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L. Carlsson | C | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 20:18 | 4:35 |
| C. Gauthier | LW | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | +2 | 0 | 17:14 | 4:25 |
| B. Sennecke | RW | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | +2 | 2 | 16:13 | 1:12 |
| C. Kreider | LW | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14:49 | 4:25 |
| T. Terry | RW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18:51 | 4:36 |
| M. McTavish | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | +2 | 0 | 16:04 | 1:14 |
| A. Killorn | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 16:22 | 1:12 |
| R. Poehling | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -1 | 2 | 12:43 | 0:00 |
| F. Vatrano | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11:58 | 0:00 |
| N. Nesterenko | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 11:18 | 0:00 |
| R. Johnston | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 10:50 | 0:00 |
| J. Harkins | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 9:33 | 0:00 |
| J. LaCombe | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | +1 | 0 | 24:19 | 4:52 |
| D. Helleson | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | +1 | 0 | 18:10 | 0:09 |
| J. Trouba | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 25:19 | 0:56 |
| O. Zellweger | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 17:27 | 1:24 |
| P. Mintyukov | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15:34 | 0:00 |
| I. Moore | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 14:58 | 0:00 |
Lines at 5-on-5
WPG
ANA
From the NHL's shift charts: the players on the ice together most at 5-on-5, with each one's own 5-on-5 time.
How We Did
| We projected | It finished | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | WPG 3.5, ANA 2.6 | WPG 1, ANA 4 |
| Total goals | 6.0 | 5 |
| Shots on goal | WPG 30.2, ANA 27.3 | WPG 24, ANA 21 |
| Win chance | WPG 63% | ANA won |
Players
| Player | SOG projected | SOG | Points projected | Points | Goal chance | Goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WPG K. Connor | 3.4 | 6 | 1.17 | 1 | 39% | 1 |
| ANA C. Gauthier | 3.2 | 5 | 0.70 | 2 | 27% | 0 |
| WPG M. Scheifele | 2.4 | 1 | 1.09 | 1 | 36% | 0 |
| ANA T. Terry | 2.3 | 1 | 0.70 | 1 | 24% | 0 |
| WPG G. Vilardi | 2.3 | 1 | 0.85 | 0 | 32% | 0 |
| WPG J. Morrissey | 2.3 | 4 | 0.85 | 1 | 16% | 0 |
| WPG N. Pionk | 2.2 | 0 | 0.49 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
| ANA C. Kreider | 2.2 | 0 | 0.58 | 2 | 31% | 0 |
| ANA M. McTavish | 2.0 | 0 | 0.52 | 1 | 20% | 0 |
| ANA O. Zellweger | 2.0 | 0 | 0.28 | 0 | 7% | 0 |
| WPG C. Perfetti | 2.0 | 1 | 0.62 | 0 | 21% | 0 |
| ANA L. Carlsson | 1.9 | 3 | 0.68 | 2 | 23% | 2 |
| ANA J. LaCombe | 1.8 | 2 | 0.51 | 1 | 11% | 0 |
| WPG N. Niederreiter | 1.8 | 1 | 0.45 | 0 | 21% | 0 |
| ANA J. Trouba | 1.7 | 2 | 0.33 | 0 | 7% | 0 |
| WPG A. Iafallo | 1.7 | 2 | 0.46 | 0 | 19% | 0 |
| ANA A. Killorn | 1.7 | 1 | 0.44 | 0 | 20% | 0 |
| ANA F. Vatrano | 1.6 | 0 | 0.30 | 0 | 16% | 0 |
| WPG A. Lowry | 1.6 | 0 | 0.44 | 0 | 19% | 0 |
| WPG V. Namestnikov | 1.5 | 0 | 0.52 | 0 | 18% | 0 |
| WPG J. Toews | 1.5 | 1 | 0.51 | 0 | 19% | 0 |
| ANA B. Sennecke | 1.4 | 2 | 0.41 | 2 | 16% | 2 |
| ANA N. Nesterenko | 1.4 | 0 | 0.34 | 0 | 14% | 0 |
| WPG T. Pearson | 1.4 | 0 | 0.34 | 0 | 14% | 0 |
| ANA D. Helleson | 1.3 | 2 | 0.30 | 1 | 8% | 0 |
| WPG L. Stanley | 1.2 | 1 | 0.29 | 0 | 5% | 0 |
| WPG D. DeMelo | 1.1 | 1 | 0.35 | 0 | 5% | 0 |
| ANA R. Poehling | 1.1 | 1 | 0.34 | 0 | 13% | 0 |
| WPG H. Fleury | 1.0 | 1 | 0.15 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
| WPG N. Chibrikov | 1.0 | 2 | 0.28 | 0 | 14% | 0 |
| ANA I. Moore | 0.9 | 2 | 0.16 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| WPG L. Schenn | 0.9 | 2 | 0.11 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
| WPG P. Ford | 0.8 | 0 | 0.23 | 0 | 11% | 0 |
| ANA P. Mintyukov | 0.8 | 0 | 0.23 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| ANA J. Harkins | 0.8 | 0 | 0.11 | 0 | 6% | 0 |
| ANA R. Johnston | 0.4 | 0 | 0.12 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
Shots on goal: 17 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.4 fewer than projected on average.
Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.