DET beat WSH 3-2 in overtime despite fewer good chances: 2.59 expected goals to 4.65. E. Frank led the way with 2 points (2 G, 0 A). A. Beauvillier had 5 shots on goal against our projection of 2.0. C. Talbot stopped 31 of 33.
Scoring
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | OT | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WSH | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| DET | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
- 1st 14:17WSHE. Frank0.13 xG
- 2nd 8:37DETL. RaymondPP0.07 xG
- 2nd 13:44DETJ. Leonard0.06 xG
- 3rd 10:22WSHE. Frank0.19 xG
- OT 4:36DETM. Seider0.12 xG
Team Stats
Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.
Expected Goals Over the Game
WSH 4.65 xGDET 2.59 xGGoal
Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.
Shot Map
GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance
Box Score
WSH Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D. Strome | C | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 2 | 20:36 | 0:56 |
| E. Frank | RW | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | +2 | 0 | 15:44 | 1:04 |
| A. Protas | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 21:14 | 0:00 |
| T. Wilson | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 21:00 | 0:59 |
| J. Sourdif | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 19:45 | 1:01 |
| A. Ovechkin | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 17:28 | 1:58 |
| C. McMichael | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17:19 | 0:56 |
| N. Dowd | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 16:53 | 0:00 |
| A. Beauvillier | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 15:41 | 1:04 |
| I. Miroshnichenko | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 8:27 | 0:00 |
| H. Lapierre | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7:23 | 0:00 |
| B. Duhaime | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6:36 | 0:00 |
| J. Carlson | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | +2 | 0 | 24:40 | 1:04 |
| J. Chychrun | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 24:08 | 0:56 |
| M. Roy | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 21:10 | 0:00 |
| M. Fehérváry | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | +2 | 0 | 19:07 | 0:00 |
| R. Sandin | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -2 | 0 | 18:52 | 0:02 |
| T. van Riemsdyk | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 16:52 | 0:00 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C. Lindgren | 27 | 24 | 3 | .889 | 64:21 | OT loss |
| L. Thompson | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
DET Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E. Finnie | C | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 19:14 | 0:40 |
| A. Copp | C | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15:19 | 0:26 |
| L. Raymond | LW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 21:13 | 2:59 |
| A. DeBrincat | RW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 20:39 | 2:37 |
| J. Leonard | LW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 14:00 | 0:00 |
| D. Larkin | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22:51 | 2:49 |
| J. van Riemsdyk | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 14:55 | 0:54 |
| J. Compher | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 14:26 | 0:00 |
| M. Appleton | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13:08 | 0:00 |
| N. Danielson | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13:07 | 0:22 |
| M. Rasmussen | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 12:23 | 0:00 |
| E. Soderblom | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8:34 | 0:00 |
| M. Seider | D | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 | +1 | 0 | 26:44 | 2:41 |
| A. Sandin-Pellikka | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -2 | 0 | 15:50 | 0:34 |
| S. Edvinsson | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 25:54 | 0:00 |
| B. Chiarot | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 23:23 | 0:13 |
| T. Hamonic | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 16:13 | 0:00 |
| A. Johansson | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 16:02 | 0:00 |
Lines at 5-on-5
WSH
DET
From the NHL's shift charts: the players on the ice together most at 5-on-5, with each one's own 5-on-5 time.
How We Did
| We projected | It finished | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | WSH 3.1, DET 3.0 | WSH 2, DET 3 |
| Total goals | 6.1 | 5 |
| Shots on goal | WSH 26.2, DET 29.3 | WSH 33, DET 27 |
| Win chance | DET 50% | DET won |
Players
| Player | SOG projected | SOG | Points projected | Points | Goal chance | Goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DET A. DeBrincat | 3.1 | 3 | 0.77 | 1 | 30% | 0 |
| DET D. Larkin | 2.9 | 3 | 0.86 | 0 | 33% | 0 |
| WSH A. Ovechkin | 2.9 | 5 | 0.90 | 0 | 37% | 0 |
| WSH J. Chychrun | 2.8 | 4 | 0.66 | 0 | 21% | 0 |
| DET L. Raymond | 2.3 | 5 | 0.84 | 1 | 26% | 1 |
| WSH T. Wilson | 2.3 | 1 | 0.79 | 0 | 31% | 0 |
| DET M. Seider | 2.0 | 2 | 0.54 | 1 | 9% | 1 |
| WSH A. Beauvillier | 2.0 | 5 | 0.39 | 0 | 17% | 0 |
| DET E. Finnie | 1.9 | 1 | 0.40 | 2 | 19% | 0 |
| WSH C. McMichael | 1.9 | 2 | 0.57 | 0 | 22% | 0 |
| WSH A. Protas | 1.9 | 3 | 0.64 | 0 | 23% | 0 |
| WSH J. Carlson | 1.8 | 0 | 0.59 | 1 | 11% | 0 |
| DET J. Riemsdyk | 1.7 | 0 | 0.45 | 0 | 19% | 0 |
| WSH D. Strome | 1.7 | 2 | 0.84 | 2 | 26% | 0 |
| DET A. Copp | 1.5 | 2 | 0.45 | 2 | 15% | 0 |
| WSH J. Sourdif | 1.4 | 1 | 0.37 | 0 | 15% | 0 |
| WSH E. Frank | 1.3 | 3 | 0.43 | 2 | 16% | 2 |
| DET B. Chiarot | 1.3 | 0 | 0.22 | 0 | 7% | 0 |
| WSH M. Roy | 1.2 | 1 | 0.32 | 0 | 6% | 0 |
| DET N. Danielson | 1.2 | 2 | 0.28 | 0 | 10% | 0 |
| DET S. Edvinsson | 1.2 | 1 | 0.36 | 0 | 10% | 0 |
| DET M. Rasmussen | 1.2 | 2 | 0.29 | 0 | 14% | 0 |
| DET J. Leonard | 1.2 | 2 | 0.19 | 1 | 11% | 1 |
| DET E. Soderblom | 1.1 | 1 | 0.25 | 0 | 12% | 0 |
| DET M. Appleton | 1.1 | 1 | 0.26 | 0 | 10% | 0 |
| DET J. Compher | 1.1 | 1 | 0.31 | 0 | 13% | 0 |
| DET A. Sandin-Pellikka | 1.1 | 0 | 0.32 | 1 | 8% | 0 |
| WSH R. Sandin | 1.1 | 0 | 0.32 | 0 | 6% | 0 |
| DET T. Hamonic | 1.0 | 0 | 0.14 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| WSH N. Dowd | 1.0 | 1 | 0.30 | 0 | 14% | 0 |
| WSH M. Fehérváry | 1.0 | 1 | 0.29 | 0 | 7% | 0 |
| WSH I. Miroshnichenko | 0.9 | 1 | 0.20 | 0 | 8% | 0 |
| WSH B. Duhaime | 0.8 | 1 | 0.20 | 0 | 10% | 0 |
| WSH T. Riemsdyk | 0.8 | 1 | 0.23 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
| WSH H. Lapierre | 0.7 | 1 | 0.24 | 0 | 7% | 0 |
| DET A. Johansson | 0.7 | 1 | 0.13 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
Shots on goal: 23 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.1 more than projected on average.
Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.