OTT beat PIT 3-2, and the chances backed it up: 4.41 expected goals to 2.73. OTT outshot PIT 31 to 16. T. Stützle led the way with 2 points (1 G, 1 A). L. Ullmark stopped 14 of 16.
Scoring
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OTT | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| PIT | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
- 1st 7:57PITE. Chinakhov0.20 xG
- 2nd 1:35OTTM. Amadio0.23 xG
- 3rd 6:46OTTT. Stützle0.04 xG
- 3rd 8:48PITT. Novak0.89 xG
- 3rd 14:52OTTC. Giroux0.60 xG
Team Stats
Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.
Expected Goals Over the Game
OTT 4.41 xGPIT 2.73 xGGoal
Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.
Shot Map
GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance
Box Score
OTT Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T. Stützle | C | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 2 | +2 | 0 | 20:46 | 5:48 |
| D. Batherson | RW | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | +2 | 0 | 17:12 | 5:26 |
| S. Pinto | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 20:45 | 3:42 |
| M. Amadio | RW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 18:59 | 0:08 |
| C. Giroux | RW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | +2 | 0 | 14:25 | 4:03 |
| R. Greig | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 17:09 | 0:54 |
| B. Tkachuk | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 16:31 | 5:30 |
| D. Cozens | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 16:20 | 5:30 |
| N. Cousins | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | +1 | 2 | 15:39 | 0:08 |
| F. Zetterlund | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 9:33 | 0:52 |
| L. Eller | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 9:16 | 0:00 |
| S. Halliday | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 6:46 | 3:30 |
| J. Spence | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | +2 | 0 | 16:31 | 4:12 |
| T. Kleven | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | +2 | 0 | 12:37 | 0:00 |
| J. Sanderson | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 28:02 | 5:55 |
| A. Zub | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 22:34 | 0:17 |
| T. Chabot | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | -2 | 0 | 20:41 | 4:05 |
| N. Jensen | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -2 | 0 | 14:14 | 0:00 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L. Ullmark | 16 | 14 | 2 | .875 | 60:00 | Win |
| J. Reimer | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
PIT Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E. Chinakhov | RW | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12:12 | 0:06 |
| E. Malkin | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15:51 | 1:54 |
| T. Novak | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11:52 | 0:00 |
| S. Crosby | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 19:35 | 1:51 |
| R. Rakell | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 2 | 19:01 | 1:53 |
| A. Mantha | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 16:47 | 1:41 |
| B. Kindel | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15:52 | 0:09 |
| B. Lizotte | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 14:29 | 0:00 |
| J. Brazeau | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 14:28 | 0:19 |
| C. Dewar | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 12:51 | 0:00 |
| N. Acciari | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12:19 | 0:00 |
| R. McGroarty | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 10:37 | 0:00 |
| R. Shea | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | +1 | 0 | 20:00 | 0:00 |
| P. Wotherspoon | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 18:49 | 0:00 |
| E. Karlsson | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 27:20 | 2:00 |
| B. Kulak | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 22:01 | 0:07 |
| C. Clifton | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | -1 | 2 | 15:52 | 0:00 |
| I. Solovyov | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 2 | 12:31 | 0:00 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A. Silovs | 31 | 28 | 3 | .903 | 57:33 | Loss |
| S. Skinner | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
Lines at 5-on-5
OTT
PIT
From the NHL's shift charts: the players on the ice together most at 5-on-5, with each one's own 5-on-5 time.
Storylines That Played Out
As Tonight had them before puck drop, with what each player did.
How We Did
| We projected | It finished | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | OTT 3.1, PIT 3.3 | OTT 3, PIT 2 |
| Total goals | 6.4 | 5 |
| Shots on goal | OTT 26.8, PIT 27.2 | OTT 31, PIT 16 |
| Win chance | PIT 53% | OTT won |
Players
| Player | SOG projected | SOG | Points projected | Points | Goal chance | Goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OTT B. Tkachuk | 3.2 | 4 | 0.73 | 0 | 28% | 0 |
| PIT R. Rakell | 2.6 | 0 | 0.80 | 0 | 29% | 0 |
| PIT S. Crosby | 2.3 | 0 | 1.09 | 0 | 34% | 0 |
| OTT T. Stützle | 2.2 | 4 | 0.90 | 2 | 28% | 1 |
| PIT E. Malkin | 2.2 | 1 | 0.90 | 1 | 27% | 0 |
| OTT D. Cozens | 2.0 | 2 | 0.56 | 0 | 20% | 0 |
| OTT J. Sanderson | 2.0 | 2 | 0.66 | 0 | 12% | 0 |
| PIT E. Karlsson | 2.0 | 3 | 0.71 | 0 | 14% | 0 |
| OTT S. Pinto | 1.9 | 3 | 0.56 | 1 | 24% | 0 |
| OTT D. Batherson | 1.9 | 2 | 0.69 | 2 | 24% | 0 |
| PIT E. Chinakhov | 1.9 | 3 | 0.48 | 2 | 21% | 1 |
| PIT B. Kindel | 1.7 | 2 | 0.44 | 0 | 18% | 0 |
| OTT R. Greig | 1.7 | 2 | 0.46 | 0 | 17% | 0 |
| OTT T. Chabot | 1.6 | 2 | 0.50 | 0 | 11% | 0 |
| PIT A. Mantha | 1.6 | 3 | 0.64 | 0 | 23% | 0 |
| PIT T. Novak | 1.5 | 1 | 0.54 | 1 | 20% | 1 |
| OTT C. Giroux | 1.5 | 3 | 0.59 | 1 | 19% | 1 |
| PIT R. McGroarty | 1.4 | 0 | 0.27 | 0 | 12% | 0 |
| PIT J. Brazeau | 1.4 | 0 | 0.44 | 0 | 19% | 0 |
| OTT F. Zetterlund | 1.4 | 0 | 0.31 | 0 | 14% | 0 |
| PIT C. Dewar | 1.4 | 0 | 0.38 | 0 | 15% | 0 |
| OTT M. Amadio | 1.3 | 2 | 0.42 | 1 | 19% | 1 |
| PIT B. Kulak | 1.2 | 1 | 0.26 | 0 | 6% | 0 |
| OTT N. Cousins | 1.2 | 1 | 0.30 | 0 | 12% | 0 |
| OTT T. Kleven | 1.2 | 2 | 0.21 | 1 | 4% | 0 |
| OTT J. Spence | 1.1 | 1 | 0.31 | 1 | 5% | 0 |
| PIT N. Acciari | 1.1 | 1 | 0.26 | 0 | 11% | 0 |
| OTT A. Zub | 1.0 | 0 | 0.29 | 0 | 6% | 0 |
| OTT S. Halliday | 1.0 | 1 | 0.36 | 0 | 10% | 0 |
| PIT B. Lizotte | 0.9 | 0 | 0.38 | 0 | 15% | 0 |
| PIT R. Shea | 0.9 | 1 | 0.31 | 1 | 6% | 0 |
| PIT P. Wotherspoon | 0.9 | 0 | 0.26 | 1 | 4% | 0 |
| PIT C. Clifton | 0.9 | 0 | 0.24 | 0 | 5% | 0 |
| OTT L. Eller | 0.8 | 0 | 0.19 | 0 | 8% | 0 |
| PIT I. Solovyov | 0.8 | 0 | 0.22 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| OTT N. Jensen | 0.7 | 0 | 0.24 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
Shots on goal: 22 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.2 fewer than projected on average.
Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.