Go ad-free AND support the site for the 26-27 season for just $18. Sign up now!
Game Recap
PHI4
FinalSun, Mar 23, 2025Every game that night
CHI7

CHI beat PHI 7-4 despite fewer good chances: 2.95 expected goals to 3.50. T. Bertuzzi led the way with 3 points (1 G, 2 A). R. Donato had 6 shots on goal against our projection of 2.2. S. Knight stopped 25 of 29.

Scoring

1st2nd3rdT
PHI3104
CHI3317
  1. 1st 3:59PHIJ. Drysdale0.01 xG
  2. 1st 7:14CHIP. Maroon0.12 xG
  3. 1st 8:01CHIJ. Veleno0.09 xG
  4. 1st 8:13PHIT. Sanheim0.03 xG
  5. 1st 11:59PHIB. Brink0.70 xG
  6. 1st 18:12CHIC. Bedard0.13 xG
  7. 2nd 2:37CHIT. Bertuzzi0.27 xG
  8. 2nd 6:43CHIR. DonatoPP0.14 xG
  9. 2nd 10:14PHIT. Konecny0.06 xG
  10. 2nd 13:27CHIR. DonatoPP0.19 xG
  11. 3rd 2:13CHIL. Reichel0.09 xG

Team Stats

PHICHI
29Shots on goal29
3.50Expected goals2.95
62Shot attempts54
265v5 shots on goal22
0/2Power play2/4
24Hits17
18Blocked shots13
8Penalty minutes4
22Giveaways21
5Takeaways4

Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.

Expected Goals Over the Game

PHI 3.50 xGCHI 2.95 xGGoal

00.511.522.533.541st2nd3rdPHI goal, 3:59CHI goal, 7:14CHI goal, 8:01PHI goal, 8:13PHI goal, 11:59CHI goal, 18:12CHI goal, 2:37CHI goal, 6:43PHI goal, 10:14CHI goal, 13:27CHI goal, 2:13

Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.

Shot Map

PHI29 on goal, 4 scored
CHI29 on goal, 7 scored

GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance

Box Score

PHI Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
T. KonecnyRW112121+1018:493:13
S. CouturierC0224110217:193:13
M. MichkovRW0223000216:333:08
T. FoersterRW011322+1017:473:06
N. CatesLW011111+1016:150:46
B. BrinkRW1012110015:000:47
R. PoehlingC000002-1015:490:06
O. LycksellRW000110-1013:520:22
J. PelletierLW000131-1013:100:00
O. TippettRW000220-1012:380:54
R. AbolsC000210-1010:250:00
N. DeslauriersLW000041-109:450:00
J. DrysdaleD112201+1020:142:37
T. SanheimD101213-1222:550:53
C. YorkD0001120023:110:55
N. SeelerD000132+2017:520:00
E. AndraeD000310-2016:190:00
E. ZamulaD000000-2216:070:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
I. Fedotov29227.75959:41Loss
S. Ersson000–0:00

CHI Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
T. BertuzziLW123210+1217:293:34
T. TeravainenC022400-2018:373:36
R. DonatoC2026000018:373:36
C. BedardC1122020017:264:05
J. VelenoC112140+1017:160:00
P. MaroonLW112101+2012:381:30
P. KurashevC022100+1011:460:00
I. MikheyevRW011100-1016:581:28
N. FolignoLW011030-1014:250:14
L. ReichelLW101100+1010:270:45
F. NazarC0000010014:461:28
L. SlaggertLW000101+1010:440:00
A. VlasicD011202-1020:211:20
E. Del MastroD0001110220:290:00
C. MurphyD000214+2020:180:00
A. LevshunovD000210+1019:433:44
L. CrevierD000161-1017:300:00
W. KaiserD000100+1016:440:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
S. Knight29254.86259:46Win
A. Soderblom000–0:00

How We Did

We projectedIt finished
ScorePHI 3.1, CHI 2.8PHI 4, CHI 7
Total goals5.911
Shots on goalPHI 29.1, CHI 23.0PHI 29, CHI 29
Win chancePHI 55%CHI won

Players

PlayerSOG projectedSOGPoints projectedPointsGoal chanceGoals
PHI M. Michkov2.630.75226%0
PHI T. Konecny2.510.96233%1
PHI O. Tippett2.320.55024%0
PHI S. Couturier2.340.60219%0
CHI R. Donato2.260.76227%2
PHI T. Foerster2.230.57126%0
CHI C. Bedard2.120.79225%1
PHI N. Cates1.910.55121%0
CHI I. Mikheyev1.710.48122%0
PHI B. Brink1.520.53118%1
PHI T. Sanheim1.520.4319%1
CHI T. Bertuzzi1.520.57323%1
CHI F. Nazar1.400.44017%0
CHI T. Teravainen1.440.76223%0
PHI R. Poehling1.300.40016%0
CHI N. Foligno1.300.43117%0
PHI O. Lycksell1.210.32010%0
PHI C. York1.210.3408%0
PHI J. Drysdale1.220.3427%1
PHI N. Seeler1.210.2104%0
CHI A. Levshunov1.120.3607%0
CHI A. Vlasic1.120.3716%0
CHI C. Murphy1.120.2707%0
CHI W. Kaiser1.110.2707%0
CHI L. Slaggert1.110.25012%0
PHI E. Andrae1.030.1904%0
PHI J. Pelletier1.010.26010%0
CHI P. Maroon0.910.2829%1
CHI J. Veleno0.910.26212%1
PHI R. Abols0.920.19010%0
CHI E. Mastro0.910.2709%0
CHI L. Reichel0.910.29110%1
CHI P. Kurashev0.810.32211%0
CHI L. Crevier0.810.1707%0
PHI N. Deslauriers0.600.0905%0
PHI E. Zamula0.600.2705%0

Shots on goal: 27 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.2 more than projected on average.

Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.