PHI beat PIT 3-0, with the chances close: 2.89 expected goals to 2.15. G. Hathaway led the way with 2 points (1 G, 1 A). P. Martone had 6 shots on goal against our projection of 2.5. D. Vladar stopped 27 of 27.
Scoring
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHI | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| PIT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
- 2nd 13:39PHIP. Martone0.14 xG
- 2nd 17:43PHIG. HathawaySH0.30 xG
- 3rd 17:55PHIL. GlendeningEN0.95 xG
Team Stats
Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.
Expected Goals Over the Game
PHI 2.89 xGPIT 2.15 xGGoal
Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.
Shot Map
GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance
Box Score
PHI Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G. Hathaway | RW | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 0 | +2 | 0 | 11:15 | 0:19 |
| C. Dvorak | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 17:09 | 2:09 |
| S. Couturier | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 16:30 | 0:38 |
| O. Tippett | RW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 15:57 | 2:46 |
| T. Konecny | RW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 0 | +1 | 2 | 15:05 | 1:58 |
| P. Martone | RW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 14:27 | 2:35 |
| L. Glendening | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | +1 | 2 | 12:56 | 0:19 |
| T. Foerster | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 20:23 | 3:29 |
| N. Cates | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 17:43 | 3:05 |
| T. Zegras | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 13:03 | 2:16 |
| M. Michkov | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 9:32 | 1:38 |
| D. Barkey | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8:53 | 0:00 |
| T. Sanheim | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | +3 | 0 | 26:05 | 1:37 |
| R. Ristolainen | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 1 | +2 | 12 | 24:49 | 2:50 |
| C. York | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | +1 | 0 | 23:26 | 0:00 |
| J. Drysdale | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 20:01 | 2:57 |
| N. Seeler | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 12 | 15:25 | 0:00 |
| N. Juulsen | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7:21 | 0:19 |
PIT Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S. Crosby | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 20:51 | 4:38 |
| B. Rust | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 20:48 | 4:49 |
| R. Rakell | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 19:28 | 5:01 |
| E. Malkin | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | -2 | 2 | 17:20 | 5:55 |
| E. Chinakhov | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 15:47 | 2:42 |
| B. Lizotte | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14:13 | 0:16 |
| N. Acciari | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 13:41 | 0:13 |
| T. Novak | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 13:14 | 1:58 |
| A. Mantha | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | -1 | 10 | 12:44 | 3:03 |
| C. Dewar | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11:47 | 0:05 |
| B. Kindel | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 11:00 | 2:27 |
| E. Soderblom | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8:39 | 0:00 |
| E. Karlsson | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 2 | 27:29 | 4:48 |
| K. Letang | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | -2 | 14 | 20:43 | 3:14 |
| P. Wotherspoon | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 18:40 | 0:05 |
| S. Girard | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 17:18 | 0:22 |
| R. Shea | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 17:07 | 0:10 |
| C. Clifton | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 11:34 | 0:03 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S. Skinner | 22 | 20 | 2 | .909 | 59:31 | Loss |
| A. Silovs | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
Lines at 5-on-5
PHI
PIT
From the NHL's shift charts: the players on the ice together most at 5-on-5, with each one's own 5-on-5 time.
Storylines That Played Out
As Tonight had them before puck drop, with what each player did.
How We Did
| We projected | It finished | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | PHI 2.9, PIT 3.3 | PHI 3, PIT 0 |
| Total goals | 6.2 | 3 |
| Shots on goal | PHI 24.5, PIT 25.9 | PHI 23, PIT 27 |
| Win chance | PIT 56% | PHI won |
Players
| Player | SOG projected | SOG | Points projected | Points | Goal chance | Goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHI O. Tippett | 2.6 | 1 | 0.63 | 1 | 26% | 0 |
| PHI P. Martone | 2.5 | 6 | 0.73 | 1 | 21% | 1 |
| PIT R. Rakell | 2.4 | 1 | 0.78 | 0 | 29% | 0 |
| PIT B. Rust | 2.3 | 1 | 0.88 | 0 | 32% | 0 |
| PIT E. Malkin | 2.3 | 2 | 0.94 | 0 | 28% | 0 |
| PIT S. Crosby | 2.2 | 4 | 1.03 | 0 | 32% | 0 |
| PIT E. Chinakhov | 2.1 | 3 | 0.60 | 0 | 24% | 0 |
| PIT E. Karlsson | 2.1 | 1 | 0.75 | 0 | 15% | 0 |
| PHI T. Konecny | 1.9 | 2 | 0.78 | 1 | 26% | 0 |
| PHI T. Foerster | 1.9 | 0 | 0.54 | 0 | 26% | 0 |
| PHI M. Michkov | 1.9 | 2 | 0.64 | 0 | 21% | 0 |
| PHI T. Zegras | 1.8 | 0 | 0.70 | 0 | 23% | 0 |
| PHI C. Dvorak | 1.7 | 2 | 0.60 | 1 | 19% | 0 |
| PIT A. Mantha | 1.7 | 0 | 0.69 | 0 | 26% | 0 |
| PIT T. Novak | 1.7 | 3 | 0.60 | 0 | 23% | 0 |
| PIT B. Kindel | 1.6 | 3 | 0.43 | 0 | 18% | 0 |
| PHI R. Ristolainen | 1.5 | 3 | 0.38 | 0 | 6% | 0 |
| PHI N. Cates | 1.5 | 1 | 0.54 | 0 | 18% | 0 |
| PHI S. Couturier | 1.4 | 1 | 0.43 | 1 | 14% | 0 |
| PIT C. Dewar | 1.3 | 0 | 0.36 | 0 | 15% | 0 |
| PIT E. Soderblom | 1.3 | 1 | 0.32 | 0 | 15% | 0 |
| PHI J. Drysdale | 1.2 | 0 | 0.38 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
| PIT K. Letang | 1.2 | 3 | 0.42 | 0 | 8% | 0 |
| PHI T. Sanheim | 1.2 | 2 | 0.42 | 0 | 11% | 0 |
| PIT N. Acciari | 1.2 | 2 | 0.28 | 0 | 13% | 0 |
| PHI C. York | 1.1 | 0 | 0.30 | 0 | 7% | 0 |
| PHI N. Seeler | 1.0 | 0 | 0.17 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| PHI D. Barkey | 1.0 | 0 | 0.39 | 0 | 12% | 0 |
| PIT B. Lizotte | 0.9 | 0 | 0.35 | 0 | 14% | 0 |
| PHI L. Glendening | 0.9 | 2 | 0.17 | 1 | 8% | 1 |
| PIT P. Wotherspoon | 0.8 | 0 | 0.31 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
| PIT R. Shea | 0.8 | 1 | 0.36 | 0 | 7% | 0 |
| PIT C. Clifton | 0.8 | 0 | 0.21 | 0 | 5% | 0 |
| PIT S. Girard | 0.8 | 2 | 0.31 | 0 | 5% | 0 |
| PHI G. Hathaway | 0.8 | 1 | 0.19 | 2 | 10% | 1 |
| PHI N. Juulsen | 0.5 | 0 | 0.13 | 0 | 2% | 0 |
Shots on goal: 17 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.1 fewer than projected on average.
Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.