Go ad-free AND support the site for the 26-27 season for just $18. Sign up now!
Game Recap
PHI4
FinalThu, Oct 17, 2024Every game that night
SEA6

SEA beat PHI 6-4, with the chances close: 2.65 expected goals to 2.19. S. Laughton led the way with 3 points (2 G, 1 A). J. Oleksiak had 4 shots on goal against our projection of 1.1. P. Grubauer stopped 21 of 25.

Scoring

1st2nd3rdT
PHI2024
SEA1416
  1. 1st 4:21PHIS. Laughton0.02 xG
  2. 1st 18:15SEAB. Montour0.02 xG
  3. 1st 18:58PHIS. Laughton0.03 xG
  4. 2nd 3:06SEAJ. McCannPP0.11 xG
  5. 2nd 14:57SEAE. Tolvanen0.40 xG
  6. 2nd 17:44SEAJ. Eberle0.23 xG
  7. 2nd 17:52SEAS. Wright0.15 xG
  8. 3rd 10:19PHIC. York0.15 xG
  9. 3rd 12:32PHIJ. DrysdalePP0.04 xG
  10. 3rd 14:52SEAO. Bjorkstrand0.22 xG

Team Stats

PHISEA
25Shots on goal29
2.19Expected goals2.65
60Shot attempts64
165v5 shots on goal21
1/4Power play1/5
27Hits21
21Blocked shots19
19Penalty minutes15
10Giveaways12
9Takeaways8

Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.

Expected Goals Over the Game

PHI 2.19 xGSEA 2.65 xGGoal

00.511.522.531st2nd3rdPHI goal, 4:21SEA goal, 18:15PHI goal, 18:58SEA goal, 3:06SEA goal, 14:57SEA goal, 17:44SEA goal, 17:52PHI goal, 10:19PHI goal, 12:32SEA goal, 14:52

Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.

Shot Map

PHI25 on goal, 4 scored
SEA27 on goal, 6 scored

GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance

Box Score

PHI Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
S. LaughtonC213251+3016:120:27
R. PoehlingC022200+2011:000:00
G. HathawayRW022060+2410:250:00
M. MichkovRW011100-2221:544:54
B. BrinkRW0113300012:231:15
M. FrostC000303-2220:183:57
O. TippettRW000412-1020:124:54
T. FoersterRW000030-3016:251:12
T. KonecnyRW000010-1515:234:13
S. CouturierC0004010013:310:00
J. FarabeeLW000101-2212:552:19
J. LuchankoC000030-2012:141:05
C. YorkD1011250225:170:20
J. DrysdaleD101101-3020:153:41
T. SanheimD0001020224:530:06
R. RistolainenD0001130014:300:00
E. ZamulaD0001120013:402:17
E. JohnsonD000010-1012:360:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
I. Fedotov24195.79240:00Loss
S. Ersson541.80015:18

SEA Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
J. McCannLW123201+1016:195:32
A. BurakovskyLW022400+1015:245:06
J. EberleRW1121000014:495:42
S. WrightC1121000212:323:06
C. StephensonC011010+2020:225:16
O. BjorkstrandRW101220+1015:462:58
J. SchwartzLW011201+2215:243:05
Y. GourdeC0110110513:150:06
E. TolvanenRW101310+1011:290:00
M. BeniersC0001110018:213:25
B. TanevLW000283-1216:210:00
T. KartyeLW000252-1010:220:00
A. LarssonD0110050021:030:09
R. EvansD011112+5018:442:07
B. MontourD101311-1418:423:28
V. DunnD011102-1013:103:05
J. OleksiakD0004000023:310:10
W. BorgenD000000+1016:330:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
P. Grubauer25214.84059:45Win
J. Daccord000–0:00

How We Did

We projectedIt finished
ScorePHI 2.9, SEA 3.1PHI 4, SEA 6
Total goals6.010
Shots on goalPHI 30.2, SEA 27.0PHI 25, SEA 29
Win chanceSEA 53%SEA won

Players

PlayerSOG projectedSOGPoints projectedPointsGoal chanceGoals
PHI O. Tippett3.140.59025%0
PHI T. Konecny3.000.86032%0
SEA J. McCann2.420.87333%1
SEA B. Montour2.230.64115%1
PHI T. Foerster2.000.44022%0
SEA O. Bjorkstrand1.920.66123%1
SEA J. Eberle1.810.68224%1
SEA A. Burakovsky1.840.66222%0
PHI M. Frost1.730.52016%0
SEA J. Schwartz1.720.55122%0
SEA M. Beniers1.710.63023%0
PHI S. Couturier1.640.34011%0
SEA V. Dunn1.610.70113%0
PHI J. Farabee1.610.43017%0
PHI T. Sanheim1.510.3809%0
SEA E. Tolvanen1.530.49120%1
PHI C. York1.510.3619%1
PHI S. Laughton1.520.37313%2
SEA Y. Gourde1.400.51117%0
SEA A. Larsson1.400.3018%0
PHI R. Poehling1.320.35215%0
PHI G. Hathaway1.300.26213%0
SEA S. Wright1.210.47221%1
SEA T. Kartye1.220.32016%0
PHI J. Drysdale1.210.2415%1
PHI B. Brink1.230.34113%0
SEA C. Stephenson1.200.78122%0
SEA J. Oleksiak1.140.2906%0
SEA B. Tanev1.120.36016%0
PHI R. Ristolainen1.110.1803%0
SEA R. Evans1.010.3116%0
SEA W. Borgen1.000.2704%0
PHI E. Zamula0.910.3006%0
PHI E. Johnson0.900.1305%0

Shots on goal: 22 of 34 players within one of their projection; they took 0.0 more than projected on average.

Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.