WSH beat PHI 3-1, and the chances backed it up: 3.66 expected goals to 2.66. A. Protas led the way with 2 points (1 G, 1 A). R. Ristolainen had 4 shots on goal against our projection of 1.4. L. Thompson stopped 23 of 24.
Scoring
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHI | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| WSH | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
- 2nd 13:52WSHR. Sandin0.17 xG
- 3rd 0:29PHIN. Cates0.11 xG
- 3rd 14:08WSHT. van Riemsdyk0.28 xG
- 3rd 19:34WSHA. ProtasEN0.53 xG
Team Stats
Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.
Expected Goals Over the Game
PHI 2.66 xGWSH 3.66 xGGoal
Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.
Shot Map
GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance
Box Score
PHI Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B. Brink | RW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 16:07 | 1:23 |
| N. Cates | LW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 15:10 | 1:04 |
| T. Konecny | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 21:37 | 1:45 |
| C. Dvorak | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 20:10 | 1:44 |
| T. Zegras | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 19:10 | 1:41 |
| S. Couturier | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | -2 | 0 | 17:29 | 0:00 |
| O. Tippett | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3 | -3 | 0 | 17:28 | 1:28 |
| M. Michkov | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 16:52 | 1:05 |
| D. Barkey | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 14:22 | 0:55 |
| N. Grebenkin | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9:13 | 0:00 |
| G. Hathaway | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7:43 | 0:00 |
| C. Grundstrom | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7:43 | 0:00 |
| T. Sanheim | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 | 21:59 | 0:07 |
| R. Ristolainen | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 22:25 | 0:08 |
| J. Drysdale | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | -1 | 0 | 22:20 | 1:46 |
| C. York | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 19:50 | 1:22 |
| N. Seeler | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 15:29 | 0:00 |
| N. Juulsen | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15:08 | 0:00 |
WSH Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A. Protas | LW | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 15:44 | 0:00 |
| H. Lapierre | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 8:51 | 0:00 |
| A. Beauvillier | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 17:25 | 0:00 |
| E. Frank | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 17:07 | 0:21 |
| R. Leonard | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 17:07 | 1:39 |
| P. Dubois | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 16:57 | 0:57 |
| C. McMichael | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 16:09 | 0:21 |
| J. Sourdif | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15:35 | 1:03 |
| D. Strome | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14:40 | 1:39 |
| A. Ovechkin | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 13:22 | 1:39 |
| N. Dowd | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 13:05 | 0:00 |
| B. Duhaime | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 12:41 | 0:00 |
| J. Chychrun | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 24:14 | 1:39 |
| R. Sandin | D | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 20:01 | 0:21 |
| T. van Riemsdyk | D | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 17:27 | 0:00 |
| D. Chisholm | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 15:08 | 0:00 |
| M. Roy | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 21:04 | 0:21 |
| M. Fehérváry | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 20:34 | 0:00 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L. Thompson | 24 | 23 | 1 | .958 | 60:00 | Win |
| C. Lindgren | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
Lines at 5-on-5
PHI
WSH
From the NHL's shift charts: the players on the ice together most at 5-on-5, with each one's own 5-on-5 time.
Storylines That Played Out
As Tonight had them before puck drop, with what each player did.
How We Did
| We projected | It finished | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | PHI 2.8, WSH 3.6 | PHI 1, WSH 3 |
| Total goals | 6.4 | 4 |
| Shots on goal | PHI 25.8, WSH 27.2 | PHI 24, WSH 29 |
| Win chance | WSH 61% | WSH won |
Players
| Player | SOG projected | SOG | Points projected | Points | Goal chance | Goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WSH J. Chychrun | 2.9 | 1 | 0.76 | 1 | 24% | 0 |
| WSH A. Ovechkin | 2.7 | 3 | 0.95 | 0 | 37% | 0 |
| PHI O. Tippett | 2.6 | 2 | 0.56 | 0 | 23% | 0 |
| PHI T. Konecny | 2.3 | 1 | 0.86 | 0 | 28% | 0 |
| PHI M. Michkov | 2.1 | 2 | 0.54 | 0 | 20% | 0 |
| WSH A. Beauvillier | 2.1 | 4 | 0.46 | 0 | 20% | 0 |
| PHI T. Zegras | 2.1 | 1 | 0.69 | 0 | 23% | 0 |
| PHI C. Dvorak | 2.0 | 2 | 0.63 | 0 | 20% | 0 |
| WSH A. Protas | 2.0 | 1 | 0.79 | 2 | 26% | 1 |
| WSH R. Leonard | 1.9 | 3 | 0.61 | 0 | 19% | 0 |
| WSH D. Strome | 1.8 | 1 | 0.94 | 0 | 28% | 0 |
| WSH C. McMichael | 1.7 | 2 | 0.63 | 0 | 22% | 0 |
| WSH J. Sourdif | 1.7 | 0 | 0.64 | 0 | 23% | 0 |
| PHI S. Couturier | 1.7 | 1 | 0.41 | 0 | 12% | 0 |
| PHI B. Brink | 1.6 | 1 | 0.49 | 1 | 18% | 0 |
| PHI N. Cates | 1.5 | 2 | 0.44 | 1 | 16% | 1 |
| WSH E. Frank | 1.5 | 4 | 0.52 | 0 | 20% | 0 |
| WSH P. Dubois | 1.5 | 1 | 0.64 | 0 | 21% | 0 |
| PHI R. Ristolainen | 1.4 | 4 | 0.26 | 0 | 5% | 0 |
| PHI C. Grundstrom | 1.4 | 2 | 0.24 | 0 | 13% | 0 |
| PHI C. York | 1.3 | 3 | 0.36 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
| PHI J. Drysdale | 1.2 | 2 | 0.39 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
| PHI T. Sanheim | 1.2 | 0 | 0.35 | 1 | 9% | 0 |
| WSH M. Roy | 1.1 | 1 | 0.31 | 0 | 5% | 0 |
| WSH R. Sandin | 1.1 | 2 | 0.34 | 1 | 6% | 1 |
| PHI N. Seeler | 1.0 | 0 | 0.17 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| PHI D. Barkey | 1.0 | 1 | 0.35 | 0 | 11% | 0 |
| WSH N. Dowd | 1.0 | 1 | 0.39 | 0 | 16% | 0 |
| WSH M. Fehérváry | 0.9 | 0 | 0.33 | 0 | 8% | 0 |
| WSH B. Duhaime | 0.8 | 1 | 0.19 | 0 | 10% | 0 |
| PHI N. Grebenkin | 0.8 | 0 | 0.28 | 0 | 10% | 0 |
| PHI G. Hathaway | 0.7 | 0 | 0.17 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
| WSH D. Chisholm | 0.7 | 0 | 0.15 | 1 | 4% | 0 |
| WSH T. Riemsdyk | 0.6 | 2 | 0.21 | 1 | 3% | 1 |
| WSH H. Lapierre | 0.6 | 2 | 0.22 | 1 | 7% | 0 |
| PHI N. Juulsen | 0.5 | 0 | 0.12 | 0 | 2% | 0 |
Shots on goal: 22 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.0 more than projected on average.
Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.