Go ad-free AND support the site for the 26-27 season for just $18. Sign up now!
Game Recap
PIT1
FinalTue, Mar 25, 2025Every game that night
TBL6

TBL beat PIT 6-1, and the chances backed it up: 3.23 expected goals to 1.02. TBL outshot PIT 27 to 15. N. Kucherov led the way with 3 points (1 G, 2 A). A. Vasilevskiy stopped 14 of 15.

Scoring

1st2nd3rdT
PIT0011
TBL4206
  1. 1st 12:13TBLA. Cirelli0.29 xG
  2. 1st 13:30TBLR. McDonagh0.02 xG
  3. 1st 15:12TBLA. Cirelli0.12 xG
  4. 1st 16:00TBLB. Point0.50 xG
  5. 2nd 15:31TBLN. KucherovPP0.07 xG
  6. 2nd 19:19TBLB. Hagel0.09 xG
  7. 3rd 14:15PITB. Rust0.05 xG

Team Stats

PITTBL
15Shots on goal27
1.02Expected goals3.23
41Shot attempts58
135v5 shots on goal24
0/1Power play1/4
37Hits10
16Blocked shots16
18Penalty minutes4
9Giveaways14
4Takeaways5

Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.

Expected Goals Over the Game

PIT 1.02 xGTBL 3.23 xGGoal

00.511.522.533.51st2nd3rdTBL goal, 12:13TBL goal, 13:30TBL goal, 15:12TBL goal, 16:00TBL goal, 15:31TBL goal, 19:19PIT goal, 14:15

Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.

Shot Map

PIT14 on goal, 1 scored
TBL26 on goal, 6 scored

GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance

Box Score

PIT Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
B. RustRW101111-2021:381:03
S. CrosbyC011221-2019:411:04
B. LizotteC000020-2018:300:00
R. RakellRW000112-1218:251:16
C. DewarC000222-3017:460:00
N. AcciariC000143-2016:130:00
K. HayesRW0000600011:581:12
J. KoppanenLW0001300011:580:00
D. HeinenLW0000000011:480:46
P. TomasinoRW0000000011:240:44
E. BemstromC000100008:030:58
B. ImamaLW0001710145:410:00
M. GrzelcykD011021-2020:000:58
E. KarlssonD000011-2024:441:02
K. LetangD000322-2022:430:57
C. TimminsD000200-2019:460:00
R. GravesD0000220216:010:00
V. KolyachonokD0000200015:490:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
T. Jarry734.42916:00Loss
A. Nedeljkovic20182.90044:00

TBL Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
N. KucherovRW123202+2218:172:50
A. CirelliC202400+2018:202:57
B. HagelLW112420+2017:582:58
J. GuentzelC011200+2020:554:12
B. PointC101301+2020:203:36
N. PaulLW011201+2017:511:44
O. BjorkstrandRW0111120012:562:12
Y. GourdeC0001110017:072:23
Z. GirgensonsC0000310012:370:00
G. GoncalvesC0000110012:310:00
L. GlendeningC0001000012:140:00
R. McDonaghD112201+2021:050:36
D. RaddyshD011201+1019:532:31
J. MoserD011101+1017:450:00
N. PerbixD011101+1016:460:00
E. LillebergD011001+1214:500:00
E. CernakD011022+104:200:00
V. HedmanD000100+1020:263:21
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
A. Vasilevskiy15141.93359:49Win
B. Halverson000–0:00

Storylines That Played Out

  • Old teamJake Guentzel TBL Faces PIT, his team until Feb 20241 A, 2 SOG

As Tonight had them before puck drop, with what each player did.

How We Did

We projectedIt finished
ScorePIT 2.9, TBL 3.9PIT 1, TBL 6
Total goals6.87
Shots on goalPIT 27.2, TBL 31.7PIT 15, TBL 27
Win chanceTBL 65%TBL won

Players

PlayerSOG projectedSOGPoints projectedPointsGoal chanceGoals
TBL N. Kucherov3.121.60336%1
TBL J. Guentzel2.921.12139%0
TBL B. Hagel2.641.07233%1
TBL B. Point2.631.15142%1
PIT S. Crosby2.620.98131%0
PIT B. Rust2.510.76129%1
TBL V. Hedman2.410.91015%0
PIT R. Rakell2.310.71028%0
PIT E. Karlsson2.200.64014%0
PIT K. Letang1.930.47011%0
TBL A. Cirelli1.840.69224%2
PIT P. Tomasino1.800.47017%0
TBL O. Bjorkstrand1.710.60121%0
TBL N. Paul1.720.53122%0
TBL Y. Gourde1.510.57017%0
TBL D. Raddysh1.420.4417%0
PIT K. Hayes1.400.30012%0
PIT C. Dewar1.220.25011%0
PIT B. Lizotte1.100.33014%0
TBL R. McDonagh1.120.3724%1
PIT M. Grzelcyk1.000.3514%0
PIT N. Acciari1.010.19011%0
TBL Z. Girgensons1.000.1809%0
TBL E. Cernak1.000.2814%0
PIT D. Heinen1.000.30013%0
PIT C. Timmins1.020.2705%0
TBL G. Goncalves0.900.35012%0
PIT E. Bemstrom0.910.1808%0
PIT J. Koppanen0.910.23011%0
TBL J. Moser0.910.2916%0
TBL N. Perbix0.810.2514%0
PIT R. Graves0.700.1404%0
TBL L. Glendening0.710.1308%0
PIT V. Kolyachonok0.700.1805%0
TBL E. Lilleberg0.600.2011%0
PIT B. Imama0.510.0907%0

Shots on goal: 22 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.3 fewer than projected on average.

Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.