PIT beat TBL 4-3 despite fewer good chances: 3.06 expected goals to 4.50. TBL outshot PIT 40 to 31. E. Malkin led the way with 3 points (2 G, 1 A). N. Kucherov had 10 shots on goal against our projection of 3.2. T. Jarry stopped 37 of 40.
Scoring
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIT | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| TBL | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
- 1st 6:12PITV. KoivunenPP0.11 xG
- 2nd 7:53PITE. Malkin0.23 xG
- 2nd 9:49PITB. KindelPP0.11 xG
- 2nd 18:46TBLN. Kucherov0.07 xG
- 3rd 1:17TBLB. HagelPP0.05 xG
- 3rd 11:44TBLB. Hagel0.25 xG
- 3rd 17:17PITE. Malkin0.10 xG
Team Stats
Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.
Expected Goals Over the Game
PIT 3.06 xGTBL 4.50 xGGoal
Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.
Shot Map
GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance
Box Score
PIT Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E. Malkin | C | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | +2 | 2 | 14:58 | 4:10 |
| T. Novak | C | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +2 | 0 | 11:21 | 1:42 |
| B. Kindel | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 2 | -1 | 0 | 17:50 | 4:07 |
| V. Koivunen | RW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 12:48 | 1:36 |
| A. Mantha | RW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | +2 | 0 | 11:40 | 1:45 |
| B. Rust | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 21:37 | 4:05 |
| S. Crosby | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 2 | 21:30 | 4:04 |
| B. Lizotte | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 16:07 | 0:00 |
| K. Hayes | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 14:58 | 1:44 |
| C. Dewar | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 13:43 | 0:00 |
| R. McGroarty | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 13:01 | 0:00 |
| B. Imama | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5:38 | 0:00 |
| E. Karlsson | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 2 | 25:29 | 4:15 |
| K. Letang | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 20:03 | 1:34 |
| R. Shea | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 20:05 | 0:03 |
| P. Wotherspoon | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 20:01 | 0:00 |
| R. Graves | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 14:40 | 0:00 |
| C. Clifton | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 14:16 | 0:00 |
TBL Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N. Kucherov | RW | 1 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 25:28 | 9:40 |
| B. Hagel | LW | 2 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17:09 | 3:37 |
| J. Guentzel | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 26:08 | 9:39 |
| N. Paul | LW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 17:24 | 5:08 |
| G. Goncalves | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 8:16 | 2:48 |
| A. Cirelli | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 17:40 | 0:56 |
| O. Bjorkstrand | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17:24 | 8:26 |
| Y. Gourde | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 16:22 | 0:02 |
| Z. Girgensons | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15:38 | 0:02 |
| P. Holmberg | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13:41 | 0:02 |
| D. James | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9:02 | 0:35 |
| C. Douglas | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2:33 | 0:00 |
| D. Raddysh | D | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 2 | 27:49 | 8:18 |
| J. Moser | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 23:03 | 0:04 |
| C. D'Astous | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 2 | 19:31 | 1:53 |
| E. Lilleberg | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 18:06 | 0:05 |
| D. Carlile | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 10:57 | 0:00 |
| M. Crozier | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 10:12 | 0:00 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J. Johansson | 31 | 27 | 4 | .871 | 57:48 | Loss |
| B. Halverson | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
Lines at 5-on-5
PIT
TBL
From the NHL's shift charts: the players on the ice together most at 5-on-5, with each one's own 5-on-5 time.
Storylines That Played Out
As Tonight had them before puck drop, with what each player did.
How We Did
| We projected | It finished | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | PIT 2.7, TBL 3.3 | PIT 4, TBL 3 |
| Total goals | 6.0 | 7 |
| Shots on goal | PIT 26.0, TBL 28.1 | PIT 31, TBL 40 |
| Win chance | TBL 61% | PIT won |
Players
| Player | SOG projected | SOG | Points projected | Points | Goal chance | Goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TBL N. Kucherov | 3.2 | 10 | 1.60 | 2 | 37% | 1 |
| TBL J. Guentzel | 2.8 | 3 | 1.06 | 1 | 39% | 0 |
| TBL B. Hagel | 2.6 | 7 | 0.98 | 2 | 32% | 2 |
| PIT B. Rust | 2.4 | 2 | 0.69 | 0 | 27% | 0 |
| PIT S. Crosby | 2.4 | 1 | 0.85 | 0 | 30% | 0 |
| TBL D. Raddysh | 2.2 | 2 | 0.71 | 2 | 11% | 0 |
| PIT E. Karlsson | 2.0 | 6 | 0.56 | 1 | 13% | 0 |
| PIT E. Malkin | 2.0 | 3 | 0.66 | 3 | 22% | 2 |
| TBL N. Paul | 2.0 | 1 | 0.58 | 1 | 24% | 0 |
| TBL A. Cirelli | 1.9 | 1 | 0.69 | 0 | 25% | 0 |
| PIT B. Kindel | 1.9 | 5 | 0.35 | 1 | 17% | 1 |
| TBL O. Bjorkstrand | 1.8 | 2 | 0.58 | 0 | 21% | 0 |
| PIT K. Letang | 1.8 | 3 | 0.36 | 1 | 9% | 0 |
| PIT K. Hayes | 1.7 | 3 | 0.36 | 0 | 15% | 0 |
| TBL Y. Gourde | 1.5 | 2 | 0.50 | 0 | 16% | 0 |
| PIT T. Novak | 1.5 | 0 | 0.43 | 2 | 18% | 0 |
| PIT A. Mantha | 1.5 | 1 | 0.48 | 1 | 20% | 0 |
| TBL M. Crozier | 1.4 | 2 | 0.20 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
| PIT R. McGroarty | 1.4 | 1 | 0.32 | 0 | 13% | 0 |
| PIT C. Dewar | 1.4 | 1 | 0.26 | 0 | 12% | 0 |
| TBL Z. Girgensons | 1.3 | 2 | 0.23 | 0 | 14% | 0 |
| TBL J. Moser | 1.2 | 1 | 0.32 | 0 | 6% | 0 |
| TBL D. James | 1.1 | 1 | 0.35 | 0 | 14% | 0 |
| TBL P. Holmberg | 1.1 | 3 | 0.30 | 0 | 11% | 0 |
| PIT V. Koivunen | 1.1 | 2 | 0.27 | 1 | 8% | 1 |
| PIT B. Lizotte | 1.1 | 0 | 0.26 | 0 | 13% | 0 |
| TBL C. D'Astous | 1.0 | 1 | 0.44 | 0 | 8% | 0 |
| PIT C. Clifton | 1.0 | 0 | 0.20 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| PIT P. Wotherspoon | 1.0 | 3 | 0.22 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| TBL E. Lilleberg | 0.9 | 0 | 0.30 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| PIT R. Graves | 0.8 | 0 | 0.13 | 0 | 5% | 0 |
| PIT R. Shea | 0.8 | 0 | 0.19 | 0 | 6% | 0 |
| TBL G. Goncalves | 0.8 | 0 | 0.30 | 1 | 11% | 0 |
| TBL D. Carlile | 0.7 | 1 | 0.19 | 0 | 7% | 0 |
| PIT B. Imama | 0.6 | 0 | 0.09 | 0 | 7% | 0 |
| TBL C. Douglas | 0.5 | 1 | 0.12 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
Shots on goal: 25 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.5 more than projected on average.
Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.