TBL beat ANA 4-3 in overtime, with the chances close: 3.01 expected goals to 2.86. B. Hagel led the way with 3 points (0 G, 3 A). D. Raddysh had 6 shots on goal against our projection of 2.5. A. Vasilevskiy stopped 25 of 28.
Scoring
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | OT | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TBL | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| ANA | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
- 1st 13:30TBLJ. Moser0.09 xG
- 2nd 15:17ANAJ. Harkins0.08 xG
- 2nd 19:11TBLB. Point0.29 xG
- 3rd 3:57ANAB. Sennecke0.10 xG
- 3rd 8:00TBLN. KucherovPP0.06 xG
- 3rd 13:02ANAM. McTavishPP0.16 xG
- OT 2:47TBLD. Raddysh0.25 xG
Team Stats
Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.
Expected Goals Over the Game
TBL 3.01 xGANA 2.86 xGGoal
Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.
Shot Map
GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance
Box Score
TBL Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B. Hagel | LW | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 0 | +2 | 2 | 19:14 | 2:16 |
| N. Kucherov | RW | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 18:29 | 4:10 |
| B. Point | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 17:45 | 3:29 |
| J. Guentzel | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | +3 | 0 | 20:06 | 3:36 |
| A. Cirelli | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 18:00 | 2:17 |
| Y. Gourde | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 17:01 | 0:00 |
| Z. Girgensons | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16:10 | 0:00 |
| P. Holmberg | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 14:28 | 0:00 |
| G. Goncalves | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12:46 | 1:34 |
| O. Bjorkstrand | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 11:35 | 3:17 |
| N. Paul | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | -2 | 0 | 11:30 | 2:17 |
| D. James | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | -2 | 0 | 8:19 | 0:00 |
| D. Raddysh | D | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 3 | +1 | 0 | 26:08 | 3:20 |
| J. Moser | D | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | +2 | 0 | 24:57 | 0:16 |
| C. D'Astous | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | -2 | 0 | 18:48 | 2:28 |
| M. Crozier | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | +1 | 2 | 14:27 | 0:00 |
| E. Cernak | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 18:28 | 0:00 |
| D. Carlile | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14:55 | 0:00 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A. Vasilevskiy | 28 | 25 | 3 | .893 | 62:47 | Win |
| J. Johansson | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
ANA Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M. McTavish | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 18:27 | 3:43 |
| B. Sennecke | RW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 18:03 | 3:41 |
| R. Johnston | LW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8:01 | 0:00 |
| J. Harkins | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7:22 | 0:01 |
| M. Granlund | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 18:28 | 3:41 |
| L. Carlsson | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 18:26 | 3:39 |
| C. Gauthier | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 17:57 | 1:35 |
| A. Killorn | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16:48 | 0:00 |
| T. Terry | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 16:26 | 1:33 |
| C. Kreider | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | +1 | 2 | 15:46 | 1:34 |
| R. Poehling | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 13:45 | 0:02 |
| N. Nesterenko | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 13:24 | 0:00 |
| P. Mintyukov | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 2 | 22:31 | 2:11 |
| J. Trouba | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 25:42 | 1:28 |
| J. LaCombe | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 1 | -2 | 0 | 25:27 | 3:03 |
| I. Moore | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | -1 | 0 | 16:52 | 0:04 |
| D. Helleson | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 15:29 | 0:00 |
| O. Zellweger | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 13:39 | 0:00 |
Lines at 5-on-5
TBL
ANA
From the NHL's shift charts: the players on the ice together most at 5-on-5, with each one's own 5-on-5 time.
How We Did
| We projected | It finished | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | TBL 3.3, ANA 2.9 | TBL 4, ANA 3 |
| Total goals | 6.1 | 7 |
| Shots on goal | TBL 27.1, ANA 28.9 | TBL 29, ANA 28 |
| Win chance | TBL 56% | TBL won |
Players
| Player | SOG projected | SOG | Points projected | Points | Goal chance | Goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANA C. Gauthier | 3.2 | 3 | 0.70 | 0 | 27% | 0 |
| TBL N. Kucherov | 3.0 | 3 | 1.56 | 2 | 36% | 1 |
| TBL J. Guentzel | 2.9 | 2 | 1.15 | 0 | 40% | 0 |
| TBL B. Hagel | 2.5 | 6 | 0.90 | 3 | 30% | 0 |
| TBL D. Raddysh | 2.5 | 6 | 0.88 | 2 | 16% | 1 |
| TBL B. Point | 2.4 | 2 | 1.03 | 1 | 38% | 1 |
| ANA T. Terry | 2.2 | 1 | 0.72 | 0 | 25% | 0 |
| ANA M. McTavish | 2.2 | 3 | 0.60 | 1 | 22% | 1 |
| ANA C. Kreider | 2.2 | 0 | 0.61 | 0 | 33% | 0 |
| ANA L. Carlsson | 2.1 | 3 | 0.73 | 0 | 25% | 0 |
| ANA J. LaCombe | 2.0 | 5 | 0.55 | 0 | 14% | 0 |
| ANA M. Granlund | 1.9 | 1 | 0.68 | 0 | 19% | 0 |
| ANA B. Sennecke | 1.8 | 2 | 0.63 | 1 | 21% | 1 |
| TBL A. Cirelli | 1.8 | 4 | 0.64 | 0 | 23% | 0 |
| TBL O. Bjorkstrand | 1.8 | 1 | 0.65 | 0 | 23% | 0 |
| ANA J. Trouba | 1.8 | 3 | 0.31 | 0 | 8% | 0 |
| TBL N. Paul | 1.7 | 0 | 0.47 | 0 | 21% | 0 |
| TBL M. Crozier | 1.6 | 0 | 0.31 | 1 | 5% | 0 |
| ANA O. Zellweger | 1.6 | 0 | 0.27 | 0 | 8% | 0 |
| TBL Y. Gourde | 1.4 | 1 | 0.48 | 0 | 16% | 0 |
| TBL Z. Girgensons | 1.4 | 0 | 0.21 | 0 | 12% | 0 |
| TBL J. Moser | 1.4 | 1 | 0.37 | 1 | 7% | 1 |
| ANA A. Killorn | 1.3 | 2 | 0.33 | 0 | 16% | 0 |
| TBL C. D'Astous | 1.3 | 1 | 0.42 | 1 | 8% | 0 |
| ANA I. Moore | 1.3 | 0 | 0.25 | 0 | 6% | 0 |
| TBL P. Holmberg | 1.2 | 1 | 0.34 | 0 | 13% | 0 |
| ANA N. Nesterenko | 1.2 | 1 | 0.28 | 0 | 11% | 0 |
| ANA P. Mintyukov | 1.1 | 2 | 0.30 | 1 | 8% | 0 |
| TBL D. James | 1.1 | 0 | 0.35 | 0 | 12% | 0 |
| ANA R. Poehling | 1.1 | 0 | 0.37 | 0 | 13% | 0 |
| TBL E. Cernak | 1.1 | 0 | 0.28 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| TBL D. Carlile | 1.0 | 1 | 0.25 | 0 | 7% | 0 |
| TBL G. Goncalves | 0.9 | 0 | 0.38 | 0 | 13% | 0 |
| ANA D. Helleson | 0.9 | 0 | 0.20 | 0 | 6% | 0 |
| ANA J. Harkins | 0.7 | 2 | 0.11 | 1 | 6% | 1 |
| ANA R. Johnston | 0.6 | 0 | 0.17 | 1 | 5% | 0 |
Shots on goal: 20 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.1 fewer than projected on average.
Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.