ANA beat UTA 3-2 in overtime, and the chances backed it up: 2.72 expected goals to 1.60. ANA outshot UTA 26 to 18. A. Killorn led the way with 2 points (0 G, 2 A). J. LaCombe had 5 shots on goal against our projection of 1.7. L. Dostal stopped 16 of 18.
Scoring
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | OT | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UTA | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| ANA | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
- 1st 15:52ANAJ. LaCombe0.18 xG
- 2nd 18:14UTAD. Guenther0.07 xG
- 3rd 9:19UTAL. Cooley0.08 xG
- 3rd 19:55ANAT. Terry0.05 xG
- OT 1:50ANAO. Zellweger0.28 xG
Team Stats
Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.
Expected Goals Over the Game
UTA 1.60 xGANA 2.72 xGGoal
Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.
Shot Map
GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance
Box Score
UTA Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N. Schmaltz | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 19:40 | 1:08 |
| L. Cooley | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19:21 | 0:49 |
| D. Guenther | RW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 15:40 | 1:11 |
| C. Keller | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 19:40 | 1:11 |
| J. Peterka | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 16:45 | 1:10 |
| L. Crouse | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 16:01 | 0:00 |
| J. McBain | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 14:57 | 0:00 |
| B. Hayton | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 14:24 | 0:52 |
| K. Stenlund | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 13:35 | 0:50 |
| M. Carcone | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 12:34 | 0:49 |
| B. Tanev | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10:05 | 0:00 |
| L. O'Brien | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 8:39 | 0:00 |
| M. Sergachev | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -2 | 2 | 24:18 | 1:16 |
| J. Marino | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 22:52 | 0:00 |
| N. Schmidt | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 21:52 | 0:44 |
| I. Cole | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | -1 | 0 | 20:15 | 0:00 |
| N. DeSimone | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 16:51 | 0:00 |
| D. Simashev | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 14:13 | 0:00 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K. Vejmelka | 26 | 23 | 3 | .885 | 61:38 | OT loss |
| V. Vanecek | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
ANA Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A. Killorn | LW | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +2 | 0 | 14:48 | 1:01 |
| T. Terry | RW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 21:19 | 0:59 |
| C. Gauthier | LW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 20:03 | 1:01 |
| C. Kreider | LW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19:56 | 0:59 |
| B. Sennecke | RW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +2 | 2 | 17:12 | 0:59 |
| R. Strome | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 13:07 | 1:01 |
| L. Carlsson | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22:40 | 0:59 |
| M. McTavish | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13:21 | 1:01 |
| F. Vatrano | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 12:26 | 0:00 |
| J. Harkins | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 11:21 | 0:00 |
| N. Nesterenko | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 9:35 | 0:00 |
| R. Johnston | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | -1 | 5 | 8:39 | 0:00 |
| J. LaCombe | D | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 25:29 | 0:59 |
| O. Zellweger | D | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 23:12 | 1:01 |
| J. Trouba | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25:16 | 0:00 |
| D. Helleson | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | -1 | 0 | 19:51 | 0:00 |
| R. Gudas | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 12:52 | 0:00 |
| I. Moore | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | -1 | 0 | 12:11 | 0:00 |
Lines at 5-on-5
UTA
ANA
From the NHL's shift charts: the players on the ice together most at 5-on-5, with each one's own 5-on-5 time.
How We Did
| We projected | It finished | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | UTA 3.4, ANA 3.0 | UTA 2, ANA 3 |
| Total goals | 6.4 | 5 |
| Shots on goal | UTA 31.4, ANA 26.7 | UTA 18, ANA 26 |
| Win chance | UTA 57% | ANA won |
Players
| Player | SOG projected | SOG | Points projected | Points | Goal chance | Goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANA C. Gauthier | 3.0 | 5 | 0.83 | 1 | 29% | 0 |
| UTA D. Guenther | 2.9 | 5 | 0.81 | 1 | 29% | 1 |
| UTA C. Keller | 2.7 | 1 | 1.02 | 0 | 32% | 0 |
| UTA N. Schmaltz | 2.6 | 2 | 0.91 | 1 | 28% | 0 |
| UTA L. Cooley | 2.3 | 2 | 0.88 | 1 | 30% | 1 |
| ANA T. Terry | 2.3 | 3 | 0.83 | 1 | 28% | 1 |
| UTA J. Peterka | 2.1 | 0 | 0.69 | 0 | 25% | 0 |
| ANA L. Carlsson | 2.1 | 2 | 0.87 | 0 | 29% | 0 |
| ANA C. Kreider | 2.0 | 1 | 0.68 | 1 | 34% | 0 |
| UTA M. Sergachev | 2.0 | 0 | 0.72 | 1 | 13% | 0 |
| UTA L. Crouse | 1.8 | 3 | 0.38 | 0 | 20% | 0 |
| UTA B. Hayton | 1.7 | 0 | 0.43 | 0 | 17% | 0 |
| ANA J. LaCombe | 1.7 | 5 | 0.55 | 1 | 12% | 1 |
| ANA O. Zellweger | 1.7 | 4 | 0.29 | 1 | 8% | 1 |
| ANA J. Trouba | 1.7 | 1 | 0.38 | 0 | 8% | 0 |
| ANA M. McTavish | 1.7 | 0 | 0.54 | 0 | 20% | 0 |
| ANA A. Killorn | 1.6 | 1 | 0.51 | 2 | 22% | 0 |
| ANA F. Vatrano | 1.6 | 1 | 0.35 | 0 | 18% | 0 |
| ANA B. Sennecke | 1.5 | 0 | 0.55 | 1 | 20% | 0 |
| UTA N. Schmidt | 1.5 | 1 | 0.38 | 1 | 8% | 0 |
| UTA M. Carcone | 1.5 | 1 | 0.36 | 0 | 17% | 0 |
| ANA R. Strome | 1.2 | 0 | 0.42 | 1 | 13% | 0 |
| UTA J. McBain | 1.2 | 0 | 0.32 | 0 | 13% | 0 |
| UTA K. Stenlund | 1.2 | 0 | 0.32 | 0 | 14% | 0 |
| ANA N. Nesterenko | 1.2 | 1 | 0.34 | 0 | 14% | 0 |
| ANA D. Helleson | 1.2 | 0 | 0.34 | 0 | 8% | 0 |
| UTA N. DeSimone | 1.1 | 0 | 0.26 | 0 | 6% | 0 |
| UTA L. O'Brien | 1.1 | 0 | 0.16 | 0 | 6% | 0 |
| UTA D. Simashev | 1.0 | 2 | 0.12 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
| ANA I. Moore | 1.0 | 0 | 0.21 | 0 | 5% | 0 |
| UTA J. Marino | 1.0 | 1 | 0.37 | 1 | 5% | 0 |
| UTA I. Cole | 0.9 | 0 | 0.23 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
| ANA R. Gudas | 0.9 | 1 | 0.18 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
| UTA B. Tanev | 0.8 | 0 | 0.18 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
| ANA J. Harkins | 0.7 | 0 | 0.12 | 0 | 6% | 0 |
| ANA R. Johnston | 0.4 | 1 | 0.13 | 0 | 5% | 0 |
Shots on goal: 17 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.4 fewer than projected on average.
Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.