Go ad-free AND support the site for the 26-27 season for just $18. Sign up now!
Game Recap
UTA1
FinalTue, Mar 18, 2025Every game that night
EDM7

EDM beat UTA 7-1, and the chances backed it up: 5.75 expected goals to 2.04. EDM outshot UTA 43 to 30. Z. Hyman led the way with 3 points (2 G, 1 A). Z. Hyman had 8 shots on goal against our projection of 2.5. C. Pickard stopped 29 of 30.

Scoring

1st2nd3rdT
UTA0101
EDM3227
  1. 1st 12:28EDMR. Nugent-HopkinsSH0.03 xG
  2. 1st 15:14EDMZ. Hyman0.10 xG
  3. 1st 19:56EDMC. McDavid0.15 xG
  4. 2nd 7:41EDMZ. Hyman0.39 xG
  5. 2nd 9:53EDMV. Podkolzin0.04 xG
  6. 2nd 16:26UTAS. Durzi0.04 xG
  7. 3rd 0:33EDMM. Ekholm0.22 xG
  8. 3rd 2:36EDMV. Arvidsson0.11 xG

Team Stats

UTAEDM
30Shots on goal43
2.04Expected goals5.75
61Shot attempts72
285v5 shots on goal34
0/3Power play0/3
22Hits18
13Blocked shots22
11Penalty minutes11
17Giveaways12
5Takeaways4

Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.

Expected Goals Over the Game

UTA 2.04 xGEDM 5.75 xGGoal

01234561st2nd3rdEDM goal, 12:28EDM goal, 15:14EDM goal, 19:56EDM goal, 7:41EDM goal, 9:53UTA goal, 16:26EDM goal, 0:33EDM goal, 2:36

Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.

Shot Map

UTA30 on goal, 1 scored
EDM43 on goal, 7 scored

GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance

Box Score

UTA Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
L. CooleyC011320-2016:262:05
M. CarconeLW0111000011:321:40
C. KellerRW000200-2017:163:41
N. SchmaltzC000200-3017:143:29
A. KerfootC000021-3017:050:00
B. HaytonC000111-3016:213:06
L. CrouseLW000240+1016:141:30
D. GuentherRW000311-2014:583:37
J. McBainC0002210714:491:25
J. DoanRW000110-1013:280:00
K. StenlundC000103-2013:040:00
N. BjugstadC000210-1010:010:00
S. DurziD1011030020:532:18
M. SergachevD000310-2024:282:54
J. MarinoD000101-3020:310:00
I. ColeD000061-3417:390:00
M. KesselringD000410-1017:030:00
O. MaattaD000101-3014:580:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
K. Vejmelka15123.80020:00Loss
J. Stauber28244.85740:00

EDM Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
C. McDavidC123410+4016:463:52
Z. HymanLW213800+4216:113:06
R. Nugent-HopkinsC123400+4015:032:25
V. PodkolzinRW101141+1013:090:00
V. ArvidssonLW101101+2012:550:20
L. DraisaitlC000600+2022:235:09
C. BrownRW0001000015:470:00
C. PerryRW0000110015:052:00
J. SkinnerLW000200+2012:340:57
A. HenriqueC000212+1012:110:00
K. KapanenRW000200-1012:100:00
M. JanmarkC0001010011:450:00
M. EkholmD123324+3021:270:57
E. BouchardD011303+4022:543:52
J. WalmanD0001160220:270:44
D. NurseD000372+1720:231:20
B. KulakD000011+1018:331:03
T. StecherD000100+1014:170:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
C. Pickard30291.96760:00Win
S. Skinner000–0:00

Storylines That Played Out

As Tonight had them before puck drop, with what each player did.

How We Did

We projectedIt finished
ScoreUTA 3.0, EDM 3.4UTA 1, EDM 7
Total goals6.58
Shots on goalUTA 27.6, EDM 30.7UTA 30, EDM 43
Win chanceEDM 57%EDM won

Players

PlayerSOG projectedSOGPoints projectedPointsGoal chanceGoals
EDM L. Draisaitl2.961.38044%0
EDM C. McDavid2.941.57339%1
UTA D. Guenther2.830.76029%0
EDM E. Bouchard2.630.82117%0
EDM Z. Hyman2.580.69334%2
UTA C. Keller2.520.94030%0
EDM D. Nurse2.330.40011%0
EDM J. Walman2.110.44013%0
UTA B. Hayton2.110.53020%0
EDM V. Arvidsson2.010.51119%1
UTA N. Schmaltz1.920.72023%0
UTA L. Cooley1.930.64123%0
EDM M. Ekholm1.930.44312%1
EDM R. Nugent-Hopkins1.740.72322%1
EDM J. Skinner1.720.45020%0
UTA J. Doan1.510.41014%0
UTA M. Sergachev1.430.54010%0
EDM B. Kulak1.400.3207%0
UTA L. Crouse1.320.29016%0
EDM C. Perry1.300.37018%0
UTA S. Durzi1.210.3618%1
UTA N. Bjugstad1.220.25012%0
EDM C. Brown1.210.32010%0
UTA M. Carcone1.210.29115%0
EDM V. Podkolzin1.210.27111%1
UTA M. Kesselring1.140.2406%0
UTA A. Kerfoot1.100.35013%0
EDM A. Henrique1.120.38018%0
UTA J. McBain1.020.32014%0
UTA K. Stenlund1.010.21011%0
EDM K. Kapanen0.920.26011%0
UTA O. Maatta0.810.2305%0
UTA J. Marino0.710.2804%0
EDM T. Stecher0.710.1304%0
EDM M. Janmark0.710.2509%0
UTA I. Cole0.600.1603%0

Shots on goal: 21 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.5 more than projected on average.

Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.