Go ad-free AND support the site for the 26-27 season for just $18. Sign up now!
Game Recap
UTA6
FinalSat, Nov 23, 2024Every game that night
PIT1

UTA beat PIT 6-1, and the chances backed it up: 3.58 expected goals to 2.56. D. Guenther led the way with 3 points (2 G, 1 A). S. Crosby had 7 shots on goal against our projection of 2.8. K. Vejmelka stopped 27 of 28.

Scoring

1st2nd3rdT
UTA2136
PIT0101
  1. 1st 8:54UTAJ. McBain0.11 xG
  2. 1st 13:07UTAM. Sergachev0.06 xG
  3. 2nd 3:11PITS. CrosbyPP0.19 xG
  4. 2nd 10:37UTAN. BjugstadPP0.12 xG
  5. 3rd 6:38UTAD. GuentherPP0.20 xG
  6. 3rd 7:25UTAA. Kerfoot0.11 xG
  7. 3rd 15:59UTAD. GuentherPP0.07 xG

Team Stats

UTAPIT
30Shots on goal28
3.58Expected goals2.56
54Shot attempts58
235v5 shots on goal20
3/4Power play1/4
31Hits42
15Blocked shots8
8Penalty minutes8
12Giveaways7
2Takeaways7

Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.

Expected Goals Over the Game

UTA 3.58 xGPIT 2.56 xGGoal

00.511.522.533.541st2nd3rdUTA goal, 8:54UTA goal, 13:07PIT goal, 3:11UTA goal, 10:37UTA goal, 6:38UTA goal, 7:25UTA goal, 15:59

Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.

Shot Map

UTA30 on goal, 6 scored
PIT28 on goal, 1 scored

GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance

Box Score

UTA Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
C. KellerRW033101+1018:054:37
D. GuentherRW213202+1016:214:26
N. SchmaltzC022310+1218:014:38
L. CooleyC022300+2016:524:26
M. CarconeLW022510+1010:000:58
N. BjugstadC1011200013:560:57
J. McBainC101170+1013:440:00
A. KerfootC101110+1013:400:12
M. MaccelliLW0002000015:240:59
L. CrouseLW0004100014:470:56
K. StenlundC000111+1013:360:00
B. HaytonC0000110013:090:00
M. SergachevD101111+2024:224:44
M. LamoureuxD011332+1617:520:05
M. KesselringD0111230017:160:53
I. ColeD000070+1021:000:00
O. MaattaD000101+2020:100:14
R. BortuzzoD0000330014:070:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
K. Vejmelka28271.96459:48Win
J. Stauber000–0:00

PIT Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
S. CrosbyC101720-2018:444:15
E. MalkinC0002100018:514:15
B. RustRW000120-2017:543:39
R. RakellRW000040-2017:513:36
M. BuntingLW0001400216:101:03
A. BeauvillierRW0000000015:310:10
N. AcciariC0002400014:280:10
D. O'ConnorLW000121-1213:070:00
J. PuljujarviRW000011-1213:001:29
K. HayesRW0000500011:240:53
M. NietoLW0001100011:060:00
S. PoulinRW000120-109:050:00
E. KarlssonD011321-1022:443:47
M. PetterssonD000242-1024:170:00
K. LetangD000330-1023:491:43
M. GrzelcykD000312-2218:361:30
R. GravesD000030-1015:000:00
O. PickeringD0001110012:090:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
A. Nedeljkovic30246.80059:55Loss
T. Jarry000–0:00

Storylines That Played Out

As Tonight had them before puck drop, with what each player did.

How We Did

We projectedIt finished
ScoreUTA 3.2, PIT 3.1UTA 6, PIT 1
Total goals6.47
Shots on goalUTA 28.7, PIT 31.8UTA 30, PIT 28
Win chanceUTA 51%UTA won

Players

PlayerSOG projectedSOGPoints projectedPointsGoal chanceGoals
PIT S. Crosby2.871.08133%1
PIT B. Rust2.610.75029%0
UTA C. Keller2.610.94331%0
PIT R. Rakell2.600.68026%0
UTA D. Guenther2.520.75327%2
PIT E. Karlsson2.430.71116%0
PIT E. Malkin2.220.88028%0
UTA L. Cooley2.030.61222%0
PIT K. Letang2.030.53012%0
UTA N. Schmaltz1.930.82224%0
UTA M. Sergachev1.910.76112%1
PIT D. O'Connor1.810.39017%0
UTA L. Crouse1.840.45022%0
PIT A. Beauvillier1.700.37015%0
PIT M. Bunting1.710.54019%0
UTA B. Hayton1.700.41016%0
PIT J. Puljujarvi1.600.29012%0
UTA N. Bjugstad1.610.42119%1
UTA M. Maccelli1.520.65017%0
UTA A. Kerfoot1.510.52116%1
UTA M. Kesselring1.410.4218%0
UTA M. Carcone1.350.30217%0
PIT M. Pettersson1.220.3705%0
PIT N. Acciari1.220.25014%0
UTA K. Stenlund1.110.20012%0
PIT K. Hayes1.100.26010%0
PIT M. Nieto1.110.25011%0
PIT M. Grzelcyk1.130.2805%0
UTA M. Lamoureux1.030.2216%0
PIT R. Graves1.000.1805%0
UTA I. Cole0.900.2705%0
UTA J. McBain0.810.37114%1
UTA O. Maatta0.810.2606%0
PIT S. Poulin0.610.2309%0
UTA R. Bortuzzo0.400.0802%0

Shots on goal: 21 of 35 players within one of their projection; they took 0.0 more than projected on average.

Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.