PHI beat WSH 4-1, and the chances backed it up: 3.87 expected goals to 2.96. O. Tippett led the way with 2 points (1 G, 1 A). O. Tippett had 6 shots on goal against our projection of 2.8. S. Ersson stopped 22 of 23.
Scoring
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WSH | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| PHI | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
- 1st 9:51WSHR. LeonardPP0.10 xG
- 2nd 4:23PHIT. Konecny0.10 xG
- 2nd 12:13PHIT. Zegras0.21 xG
- 3rd 7:17PHIJ. Drysdale0.06 xG
- 3rd 18:57PHIO. TippettEN0.56 xG
Team Stats
Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.
Expected Goals Over the Game
WSH 2.96 xGPHI 3.87 xGGoal
Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.
Shot Map
GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance
Box Score
WSH Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P. Dubois | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -2 | 0 | 18:10 | 3:15 |
| A. Ovechkin | LW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 15:45 | 4:08 |
| R. Leonard | RW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 14:35 | 2:15 |
| T. Wilson | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 1 | -2 | 2 | 21:39 | 2:26 |
| D. Strome | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -3 | 0 | 18:38 | 3:22 |
| A. Protas | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 18:03 | 1:34 |
| J. Sourdif | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17:32 | 0:01 |
| C. McMichael | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 16:31 | 0:39 |
| A. Beauvillier | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14:27 | 0:00 |
| E. Frank | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 8:46 | 0:00 |
| B. Duhaime | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 8:10 | 0:04 |
| H. Lapierre | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6:55 | 0:00 |
| J. Chychrun | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -4 | 2 | 24:44 | 3:24 |
| M. Roy | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 19:54 | 0:00 |
| R. Sandin | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 19:19 | 1:23 |
| M. Fehérváry | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 19:09 | 0:17 |
| T. van Riemsdyk | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 16:25 | 0:00 |
| T. Liljegren | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 14:48 | 0:23 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L. Thompson | 21 | 18 | 3 | .857 | 58:30 | Loss |
| C. Lindgren | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
PHI Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| O. Tippett | RW | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 0 | +2 | 0 | 16:40 | 2:18 |
| N. Cates | LW | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | +2 | 0 | 11:28 | 1:12 |
| C. Dvorak | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 19:44 | 1:16 |
| T. Konecny | RW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 2 | 19:01 | 2:20 |
| T. Zegras | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | +3 | 2 | 16:22 | 2:16 |
| A. Bump | LW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12:14 | 1:19 |
| C. Grundstrom | RW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | +2 | 0 | 12:00 | 0:00 |
| S. Couturier | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 15:24 | 0:25 |
| N. Grebenkin | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 14:44 | 0:25 |
| M. Michkov | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12:46 | 2:19 |
| L. Glendening | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 12:10 | 0:22 |
| D. Barkey | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11:36 | 1:18 |
| T. Sanheim | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +3 | 0 | 24:01 | 0:30 |
| C. York | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | +1 | 0 | 23:10 | 1:27 |
| J. Drysdale | D | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 21:59 | 2:15 |
| R. Ristolainen | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | +2 | 2 | 21:51 | 0:18 |
| N. Seeler | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14:47 | 0:00 |
| N. Juulsen | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | +1 | 0 | 11:15 | 0:00 |
Lines at 5-on-5
WSH
PHI
From the NHL's shift charts: the players on the ice together most at 5-on-5, with each one's own 5-on-5 time.
Storylines That Played Out
As Tonight had them before puck drop, with what each player did.
How We Did
| We projected | It finished | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | WSH 3.3, PHI 2.8 | WSH 1, PHI 4 |
| Total goals | 6.1 | 5 |
| Shots on goal | WSH 25.6, PHI 26.0 | WSH 23, PHI 22 |
| Win chance | WSH 57% | PHI won |
Players
| Player | SOG projected | SOG | Points projected | Points | Goal chance | Goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHI O. Tippett | 2.8 | 6 | 0.63 | 2 | 27% | 1 |
| WSH J. Chychrun | 2.8 | 1 | 0.70 | 0 | 23% | 0 |
| WSH A. Ovechkin | 2.7 | 5 | 0.89 | 1 | 36% | 0 |
| PHI T. Konecny | 2.4 | 1 | 0.94 | 1 | 30% | 1 |
| PHI M. Michkov | 2.3 | 0 | 0.65 | 0 | 24% | 0 |
| PHI T. Zegras | 2.2 | 3 | 0.76 | 1 | 25% | 1 |
| PHI C. Dvorak | 2.0 | 3 | 0.61 | 1 | 20% | 0 |
| WSH T. Wilson | 2.0 | 2 | 0.83 | 0 | 31% | 0 |
| WSH A. Protas | 1.9 | 0 | 0.73 | 0 | 24% | 0 |
| WSH A. Beauvillier | 1.9 | 0 | 0.40 | 0 | 17% | 0 |
| WSH R. Leonard | 1.8 | 2 | 0.54 | 1 | 18% | 1 |
| WSH D. Strome | 1.7 | 0 | 0.83 | 0 | 25% | 0 |
| PHI S. Couturier | 1.7 | 0 | 0.45 | 0 | 13% | 0 |
| WSH C. McMichael | 1.7 | 2 | 0.57 | 0 | 21% | 0 |
| PHI R. Ristolainen | 1.6 | 1 | 0.27 | 0 | 5% | 0 |
| WSH P. Dubois | 1.6 | 0 | 0.66 | 1 | 22% | 0 |
| PHI N. Cates | 1.5 | 0 | 0.49 | 2 | 17% | 0 |
| PHI C. Grundstrom | 1.5 | 0 | 0.24 | 1 | 14% | 0 |
| WSH J. Sourdif | 1.4 | 4 | 0.50 | 0 | 19% | 0 |
| PHI J. Drysdale | 1.4 | 3 | 0.42 | 1 | 10% | 1 |
| WSH E. Frank | 1.4 | 1 | 0.43 | 0 | 18% | 0 |
| PHI C. York | 1.3 | 1 | 0.38 | 1 | 9% | 0 |
| PHI T. Sanheim | 1.3 | 1 | 0.41 | 1 | 10% | 0 |
| WSH R. Sandin | 1.2 | 0 | 0.38 | 0 | 6% | 0 |
| WSH M. Roy | 1.2 | 2 | 0.29 | 0 | 5% | 0 |
| PHI D. Barkey | 1.1 | 0 | 0.35 | 0 | 12% | 0 |
| PHI N. Seeler | 1.0 | 0 | 0.16 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
| WSH T. Liljegren | 1.0 | 1 | 0.26 | 0 | 6% | 0 |
| WSH M. Fehérváry | 0.9 | 1 | 0.32 | 0 | 7% | 0 |
| WSH B. Duhaime | 0.8 | 1 | 0.18 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
| WSH H. Lapierre | 0.7 | 0 | 0.25 | 0 | 8% | 0 |
| PHI N. Grebenkin | 0.7 | 1 | 0.27 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
| WSH T. Riemsdyk | 0.6 | 1 | 0.19 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
| PHI L. Glendening | 0.6 | 1 | 0.10 | 0 | 6% | 0 |
| PHI N. Juulsen | 0.6 | 0 | 0.13 | 0 | 2% | 0 |
Shots on goal: 17 of 35 players within one of their projection; they took 0.3 fewer than projected on average.
Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.