Go ad-free AND support the site for the 26-27 season for just $18. Sign up now!
Game Recap
CBJ5
FinalWed, Jan 22, 2025Every game that night
TOR1

CBJ beat TOR 5-1, with the chances close: 3.44 expected goals to 3.44. TOR outshot CBJ 29 to 19. A. Fantilli scored three for CBJ. W. Nylander had 6 shots on goal against our projection of 3.5. E. Merzlikins stopped 28 of 29.

Scoring

1st2nd3rdT
CBJ1225
TOR0011
  1. 1st 15:40CBJA. FantilliSH0.26 xG
  2. 2nd 13:40CBJJ. van Riemsdyk0.25 xG
  3. 2nd 15:21CBJA. Fantilli0.11 xG
  4. 3rd 5:56CBJL. Del Bel Belluz0.15 xG
  5. 3rd 9:22TORA. Matthews0.24 xG
  6. 3rd 12:02CBJA. FantilliEN0.83 xG

Team Stats

CBJTOR
19Shots on goal29
3.44Expected goals3.44
39Shot attempts76
155v5 shots on goal22
0/0Power play0/3
11Hits18
25Blocked shots11
13Penalty minutes9
15Giveaways14
6Takeaways4

Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.

Expected Goals Over the Game

CBJ 3.44 xGTOR 3.44 xGGoal

00.511.522.533.51st2nd3rdCBJ goal, 15:40CBJ goal, 13:40CBJ goal, 15:21CBJ goal, 5:56TOR goal, 9:22CBJ goal, 12:02

Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.

Shot Map

CBJ18 on goal, 5 scored
TOR29 on goal, 1 scored

GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance

Box Score

CBJ Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
A. FantilliC303400+3018:370:00
L. Del Bel BelluzC112311+1015:490:00
K. MarchenkoRW011100+2019:320:00
K. JohnsonC011000+1017:540:00
D. VoronkovLW011111+1216:120:00
M. OlivierRW011011+1513:480:00
J. van RiemsdykLW101402+1212:070:00
Z. Aston-ReeseLW0000020015:160:00
S. KuralyC0001200215:100:00
M. PyyhtiaLW0000220012:430:00
J. DanforthRW0002110012:410:00
Z. WerenskiD011103+2224:430:00
D. FabbroD011134+1024:230:00
I. ProvorovD0110000020:370:00
D. SeversonD000102+2017:400:00
J. ChristiansenD0000030013:390:00
J. JohnsonD000002+3010:410:00
J. HarrisD000001008:280:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
E. Merzlikins29281.96660:00Win
D. Tarasov000–0:00

TOR Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
W. NylanderRW0116000023:003:08
A. MatthewsC101612-3219:363:31
M. MarnerRW000401-1020:343:08
B. McMannC000120-1019:353:08
M. DomiC000100-1016:022:27
N. RobertsonLW000100-2015:362:50
F. MintenC000120-2014:162:50
M. KniesLW000130-1013:413:08
P. HolmbergRW000001-1013:300:00
D. KampfC0001200010:270:02
S. LorentzC000020009:080:02
R. ReavesRW000220-158:070:02
O. Ekman-LarssonD0111100223:192:27
M. RiellyD000000-2021:522:50
C. TanevD0000030020:140:02
J. McCabeD000111-3019:160:25
S. BenoitD0001200014:370:00
C. TimminsD000203-2013:560:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
D. Hildeby18144.77859:14Loss
J. Woll000–0:00

Storylines That Played Out

As Tonight had them before puck drop, with what each player did.

How We Did

We projectedIt finished
ScoreCBJ 3.0, TOR 3.5CBJ 5, TOR 1
Total goals6.56
Shots on goalCBJ 29.2, TOR 30.9CBJ 19, TOR 29
Win chanceTOR 59%CBJ won

Players

PlayerSOG projectedSOGPoints projectedPointsGoal chanceGoals
TOR A. Matthews4.061.28150%1
CBJ Z. Werenski3.510.92117%0
TOR W. Nylander3.561.18142%0
CBJ K. Marchenko2.810.79130%0
TOR B. McMann2.810.66031%0
CBJ D. Voronkov2.310.68128%0
TOR M. Marner2.341.41034%0
CBJ A. Fantilli2.240.56322%3
TOR M. Knies2.010.75030%0
TOR M. Rielly1.900.63010%0
TOR O. Ekman-Larsson1.910.4619%0
CBJ K. Johnson1.800.57121%0
TOR N. Robertson1.710.42020%0
TOR M. Domi1.610.59016%0
CBJ J. Riemsdyk1.640.45117%1
CBJ L. Belluz1.430.43216%1
CBJ D. Fabbro1.310.2615%0
CBJ Z. Aston-Reese1.300.25012%0
CBJ M. Olivier1.200.32114%0
TOR J. McCabe1.210.3807%0
CBJ J. Danforth1.220.28013%0
CBJ I. Provorov1.200.3616%0
CBJ D. Severson1.110.3207%0
TOR F. Minten1.110.31014%0
TOR P. Holmberg1.000.32014%0
TOR C. Timmins1.020.2804%0
CBJ S. Kuraly1.010.25011%0
TOR D. Kampf1.010.27011%0
TOR S. Lorentz0.900.22011%0
CBJ M. Pyyhtia0.800.1709%0
TOR C. Tanev0.800.3004%0
TOR S. Benoit0.810.1103%0
CBJ J. Christiansen0.700.1202%0
CBJ J. Johnson0.500.0902%0
TOR R. Reaves0.420.1406%0
CBJ J. Harris0.400.1203%0

Shots on goal: 19 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.2 fewer than projected on average.

Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.