Go ad-free AND support the site for the 26-27 season for just $18. Sign up now!
Game Recap
CBJ4
FinalSun, Apr 13, 2025Every game that night
WSH1

CBJ beat WSH 4-1 despite fewer good chances: 1.59 expected goals to 3.08. WSH outshot CBJ 31 to 23. A. Fantilli led the way with 2 points (2 G, 0 A). M. Roy had 4 shots on goal against our projection of 1.4. J. Greaves stopped 30 of 31.

Scoring

1st2nd3rdT
CBJ1124
WSH1001
  1. 1st 1:10WSHA. Ovechkin0.09 xG
  2. 1st 14:36CBJZ. Werenski0.03 xG
  3. 2nd 4:39CBJA. Fantilli0.16 xG
  4. 3rd 1:57CBJA. Fantilli0.21 xG
  5. 3rd 15:48CBJD. Voronkov0.18 xG

Team Stats

CBJWSH
23Shots on goal31
1.59Expected goals3.08
48Shot attempts63
195v5 shots on goal26
0/3Power play0/2
16Hits32
12Blocked shots16
9Penalty minutes11
11Giveaways12
6Takeaways4

Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.

Expected Goals Over the Game

CBJ 1.59 xGWSH 3.08 xGGoal

00.511.522.533.51st2nd3rdWSH goal, 1:10CBJ goal, 14:36CBJ goal, 4:39CBJ goal, 1:57CBJ goal, 15:48

Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.

Shot Map

CBJ22 on goal, 4 scored
WSH31 on goal, 1 scored

GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance

Box Score

CBJ Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
A. FantilliC202220+2013:540:26
S. MonahanC011001+1219:413:54
K. JohnsonC011000+1016:143:58
D. VoronkovLW101420+1013:240:32
J. van RiemsdykLW011110+1010:580:00
K. MarchenkoRW000201+1020:473:33
B. JennerC000000+1020:373:29
C. SillingerC0001200015:040:40
J. DanforthRW0000300013:150:11
S. KuralyC000320+1012:550:11
Z. Aston-ReeseLW0000110011:140:11
M. OlivierRW0000220511:090:00
Z. WerenskiD101202+1025:043:53
I. ProvorovD011100+2024:190:27
D. MateychukD000202+1019:380:35
D. FabbroD000302-1019:200:19
E. GudbransonD000110+2216:440:00
J. HarrisD000101+1011:430:11
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
J. Greaves31301.96860:00Win
D. Tarasov000–0:00

WSH Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
A. OvechkinLW1016400017:072:28
D. StromeC0112010016:292:25
T. WilsonRW000243-2019:582:00
P. DuboisC000101-2219:271:57
C. McMichaelLW000100-1017:430:33
A. MangiapaneLW000310-1015:240:30
A. BeauvillierRW0001510014:040:00
L. EllerC0002100012:290:02
N. DowdC000121-1011:590:00
R. LeonardRW0001210011:170:00
B. DuhaimeLW000121-1210:530:00
T. RaddyshRW000210-109:250:00
T. van RiemsdykD0001140222:190:00
R. SandinD000001-2022:020:00
M. RoyD000420-2021:400:05
J. ChychrunD000021-1020:462:30
M. FehérváryD0001210020:220:00
D. McIlrathD000230-1510:360:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
C. Lindgren23194.82660:00Loss
H. Shepard000–0:00

Storylines That Played Out

  • Old teamBoone Jenner WSH First game against CBJ since he left (his team until Apr 2026)0 SOG

As Tonight had them before puck drop, with what each player did.

How We Did

We projectedIt finished
ScoreCBJ 3.0, WSH 3.7CBJ 4, WSH 1
Total goals6.75
Shots on goalCBJ 26.7, WSH 30.1CBJ 23, WSH 31
Win chanceWSH 61%CBJ won

Players

PlayerSOG projectedSOGPoints projectedPointsGoal chanceGoals
WSH A. Ovechkin3.661.03142%1
CBJ Z. Werenski3.020.68116%1
WSH J. Chychrun2.600.59018%0
CBJ B. Jenner2.300.56025%0
CBJ K. Marchenko2.220.64026%0
WSH T. Wilson2.220.76031%0
WSH C. McMichael2.110.61024%0
WSH R. Leonard2.010.36018%0
CBJ A. Fantilli2.020.52222%2
WSH D. Strome2.020.94129%0
CBJ S. Monahan1.900.69122%0
WSH P. Dubois1.910.77026%0
WSH A. Beauvillier1.810.36016%0
CBJ C. Sillinger1.710.38014%0
CBJ D. Voronkov1.740.45119%1
CBJ K. Johnson1.600.61120%0
WSH M. Roy1.440.3707%0
CBJ M. Olivier1.400.36015%0
WSH A. Mangiapane1.330.45020%0
WSH L. Eller1.320.30013%0
WSH T. Raddysh1.320.31012%0
CBJ J. Danforth1.300.32014%0
CBJ I. Provorov1.310.3318%0
CBJ J. Riemsdyk1.310.43116%0
CBJ D. Fabbro1.230.2707%0
WSH B. Duhaime1.210.28013%0
CBJ Z. Aston-Reese1.100.20010%0
CBJ E. Gudbranson1.110.2205%0
CBJ S. Kuraly1.130.22010%0
WSH M. Fehérváry1.110.3308%0
WSH R. Sandin1.100.4007%0
WSH N. Dowd1.110.37018%0
CBJ D. Mateychuk1.020.2808%0
WSH T. Riemsdyk1.010.2604%0
CBJ J. Harris0.410.1203%0
WSH D. McIlrath0.420.1702%0

Shots on goal: 19 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.1 fewer than projected on average.

Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.