Go ad-free AND support the site for the 26-27 season for just $18. Sign up now!
Game Recap
DAL4
FinalTue, Feb 25, 2025Every game that night
CBJ6

CBJ beat DAL 6-4, with the chances close: 3.59 expected goals to 3.77. K. Marchenko led the way with 3 points (2 G, 1 A). I. Provorov had 5 shots on goal against our projection of 1.4. E. Merzlikins stopped 18 of 22.

Scoring

1st2nd3rdT
DAL1214
CBJ2226
  1. 1st 0:30CBJK. Marchenko0.53 xG
  2. 1st 4:37CBJM. Olivier0.09 xG
  3. 1st 9:37DALJ. Benn0.29 xG
  4. 2nd 1:11CBJK. Marchenko0.17 xG
  5. 2nd 8:46CBJI. Provorov0.02 xG
  6. 2nd 9:38DALR. Hintz0.22 xG
  7. 2nd 13:57DALJ. Robertson0.15 xG
  8. 3rd 2:37CBJJ. van Riemsdyk0.08 xG
  9. 3rd 17:53DALM. Bourque0.30 xG
  10. 3rd 19:28CBJA. FantilliEN0.93 xG

Team Stats

DALCBJ
22Shots on goal29
3.77Expected goals3.59
66Shot attempts55
175v5 shots on goal25
0/3Power play0/2
10Hits21
13Blocked shots24
4Penalty minutes6
16Giveaways15
3Takeaways3

Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.

Expected Goals Over the Game

DAL 3.77 xGCBJ 3.59 xGGoal

00.511.522.533.541st2nd3rdCBJ goal, 0:30CBJ goal, 4:37DAL goal, 9:37CBJ goal, 1:11CBJ goal, 8:46DAL goal, 9:38DAL goal, 13:57CBJ goal, 2:37DAL goal, 17:53CBJ goal, 19:28

Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.

Shot Map

DAL22 on goal, 4 scored
CBJ29 on goal, 6 scored

GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance

Box Score

DAL Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
J. RobertsonLW112630-1022:114:36
M. GranlundC022201-1018:183:18
W. JohnstonC011200-2020:133:08
R. HintzC101300-1019:402:17
M. BourqueC1011100013:520:56
J. BennLW1011010013:491:46
L. StankovenC011000+1012:581:58
E. DadonovLW0111200011:370:00
M. DucheneC000100-2217:583:11
M. MarchmentLW0000000016:212:26
S. SteelC0003000011:090:00
C. BlackwellC0000110010:570:00
T. HarleyD0111100028:244:25
E. LindellD0001020219:270:24
C. CeciD000012-1018:240:00
M. DumbaD0000010016:141:35
I. LyubushkinD0000150015:420:00
B. SmithD000000-3012:250:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
J. Oettinger28235.82156:21Loss
C. DeSmith000–0:00

CBJ Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
K. MarchenkoRW213302+1018:102:12
D. VoronkovLW022201+2017:063:01
A. FantilliC112330+2015:392:59
B. JennerC011024+1017:540:59
K. JohnsonC011400+1015:002:56
S. KuralyC011030+1014:370:00
Z. Aston-ReeseLW011100-1213:290:00
M. OlivierRW1012710013:220:00
J. van RiemsdykLW1012000010:310:57
C. SillingerC000120-1017:031:52
J. DanforthRW0001100013:540:00
J. LaBateC000021009:540:00
I. ProvorovD112502+1023:521:04
D. SeversonD011002+2013:130:00
Z. WerenskiD000404-1028:183:11
D. FabbroD000111-1023:050:00
D. MateychukD000004+2419:440:49
J. ChristiansenD000002+109:090:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
E. Merzlikins22184.81860:00Win
D. Tarasov000–0:00

How We Did

We projectedIt finished
ScoreDAL 3.3, CBJ 2.7DAL 4, CBJ 6
Total goals5.910
Shots on goalDAL 29.8, CBJ 27.5DAL 22, CBJ 29
Win chanceDAL 59%CBJ won

Players

PlayerSOG projectedSOGPoints projectedPointsGoal chanceGoals
CBJ Z. Werenski3.540.76016%0
DAL W. Johnston2.720.82130%0
DAL J. Robertson2.760.93233%1
CBJ A. Fantilli2.630.66225%1
CBJ B. Jenner2.500.60128%0
CBJ D. Voronkov2.420.66227%0
CBJ K. Marchenko2.430.68326%2
DAL T. Harley2.310.56114%0
DAL L. Stankoven2.100.40114%0
DAL M. Marchment2.100.61024%0
DAL R. Hintz2.130.75132%1
DAL M. Duchene2.010.87030%0
CBJ C. Sillinger2.010.43015%0
CBJ K. Johnson1.940.66124%0
DAL M. Granlund1.920.72217%0
DAL J. Benn1.810.67122%1
DAL E. Dadonov1.610.51119%0
DAL E. Lindell1.510.3308%0
CBJ I. Provorov1.450.3528%1
CBJ M. Olivier1.420.31114%1
CBJ J. Danforth1.410.34015%0
DAL C. Blackwell1.400.28013%0
DAL S. Steel1.430.35013%0
CBJ D. Fabbro1.310.2205%0
CBJ Z. Aston-Reese1.310.24112%0
DAL M. Bourque1.310.43117%1
CBJ J. Riemsdyk1.320.40115%1
DAL C. Ceci1.200.2906%0
CBJ D. Severson1.200.2817%0
CBJ D. Mateychuk1.200.1906%0
CBJ S. Kuraly1.100.22111%0
DAL M. Dumba0.900.1404%0
CBJ J. Christiansen0.900.1102%0
DAL B. Smith0.800.1604%0
DAL I. Lyubushkin0.700.1902%0

Shots on goal: 21 of 35 players within one of their projection; they took 0.3 fewer than projected on average.

Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.