Go ad-free AND support the site for the 26-27 season for just $18. Sign up now!
NHL Scores and Recaps

12 games

TOR5
BOS4
Final/OT
Team1st2nd3rdOTT
TOR01315
BOS21104
3.80Expected goals4.35
29Shots on goal36
63Shot attempts67
  1. M. Rielly TOR1 G, 3 A, 2 SOG
  2. D. Pastrnak BOS2 G, 1 A, 6 SOG
  3. M. Marner TOR2 G, 4 SOG

A. Stolarz TOR32 saves on 36, the win

We had TOR at 50% to win, and they did. Shots on goal: 18 of 36 players within one of their projection.

ANA2
BUF3
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
ANA1102
BUF0033
2.87Expected goals4.56
18Shots on goal37
43Shot attempts83
  1. D. Cozens BUF3 A, 4 SOG
  2. A. Tuch BUF1 G, 5 SOG
  3. J. Peterka BUF1 G, 3 SOG

U. Luukkonen BUF16 saves on 18, the win

We had BUF at 60% to win, and they did. Shots on goal: 24 of 36 players within one of their projection.

CAR0
MTL4
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
CAR0000
MTL2114
2.90Expected goals2.16
20Shots on goal18
68Shot attempts39
  1. P. Laine MTL1 G, 2 A, 3 SOG
  2. N. Suzuki MTL1 G, 2 A, 1 SOG
  3. J. Slafkovský MTL1 G, 2 SOG

S. Montembeault MTL20 saves on 20, the win

We had CAR at 60% to win; MTL won. Shots on goal: 23 of 36 players within one of their projection.

PIT1
PHI6
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
PIT0101
PHI2316
3.06Expected goals3.29
24Shots on goal38
48Shot attempts57
  1. B. Brink PHI1 G, 3 A, 4 SOG
  2. N. Cates PHI2 G, 1 A, 3 SOG
  3. T. Foerster PHI1 G, 2 A, 2 SOG

S. Ersson PHI23 saves on 24, the win

We had PIT at 51% to win; PHI won. Shots on goal: 22 of 36 players within one of their projection.

CGY3
WSH1
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
CGY2013
WSH0011
2.52Expected goals2.44
25Shots on goal27
54Shot attempts83
  1. A. Ovechkin WSH1 G, 5 SOG
  2. J. Huberdeau CGY1 G, 2 SOG
  3. M. Pospisil CGY1 G, 1 SOG

D. Vladar CGY26 saves on 27, the win

We had WSH at 59% to win; CGY won. Shots on goal: 20 of 36 players within one of their projection.

DAL4
CBJ6
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
DAL1214
CBJ2226
3.77Expected goals3.59
22Shots on goal29
66Shot attempts55
  1. K. Marchenko CBJ2 G, 1 A, 3 SOG
  2. J. Robertson DAL1 G, 1 A, 6 SOG
  3. I. Provorov CBJ1 G, 1 A, 5 SOG

E. Merzlikins CBJ18 saves on 22, the win

We had DAL at 59% to win; CBJ won. Shots on goal: 21 of 35 players within one of their projection.

EDM1
TBL4
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
EDM1001
TBL1214
1.93Expected goals2.98
24Shots on goal36
36Shot attempts67
  1. N. Kucherov TBL2 A, 3 SOG
  2. M. Eyssimont TBL1 G, 6 SOG
  3. L. Draisaitl EDM1 G, 5 SOG

A. Vasilevskiy TBL23 saves on 24, the win

We had TBL at 51% to win, and they did. Shots on goal: 21 of 35 players within one of their projection.

NYR5
NYI1
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
NYR3205
NYI1001
1.75Expected goals3.12
18Shots on goal37
46Shot attempts82
  1. J. Brodzinski NYR2 G, 1 A, 2 SOG
  2. U. Vaakanainen NYR1 G, 2 A, 1 SOG
  3. R. Lindgren NYR2 A, 0 SOG

I. Shesterkin NYR36 saves on 37, the win

We had NYI at 51% to win; NYR won. Shots on goal: 24 of 35 players within one of their projection.

SEA2
STL7
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
SEA0022
STL2417
1.88Expected goals2.89
27Shots on goal27
48Shot attempts45
  1. C. Fowler STL1 G, 2 A, 4 SOG
  2. O. Sundqvist STL1 G, 2 A, 2 SOG
  3. Z. Bolduc STL2 G, 2 SOG

J. Binnington STL25 saves on 27, the win

We had STL at 55% to win, and they did. Shots on goal: 24 of 36 players within one of their projection.

FLA4
NSH1
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
FLA1124
NSH0011
3.69Expected goals1.88
25Shots on goal18
65Shot attempts39
  1. S. Bennett FLA1 G, 1 A, 3 SOG
  2. A. Barkov FLA2 A, 0 SOG
  3. M. McCarron NSH1 G, 2 SOG

S. Knight FLA17 saves on 18, the win

We had FLA at 56% to win, and they did. Shots on goal: 18 of 35 players within one of their projection.

DET3
MIN2
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
DET0213
MIN2002
1.56Expected goals1.79
16Shots on goal24
41Shot attempts63
  1. S. Edvinsson DET2 G, 2 SOG
  2. V. Tarasenko DET1 G, 2 SOG
  3. J. Lauko MIN1 G, 1 SOG

C. Talbot DET22 saves on 24, the win

We had MIN at 52% to win; DET won. Shots on goal: 25 of 36 players within one of their projection.

CHI1
UTA2
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
CHI1001
UTA0112
1.93Expected goals4.22
22Shots on goal37
37Shot attempts92
  1. L. Crouse UTA1 G, 5 SOG
  2. C. Keller UTA1 G, 4 SOG
  3. S. Jones CHI1 G, 2 SOG

K. Vejmelka UTA21 saves on 22, the win

We had UTA at 67% to win, and they did. Shots on goal: 22 of 36 players within one of their projection.