Go ad-free AND support the site for the 26-27 season for just $18. Sign up now!
Game Recap
PHI3
Final/OTSun, Apr 13, 2025Every game that night
OTT4

OTT beat PHI 4-3 in overtime despite fewer good chances: 2.00 expected goals to 3.70. T. Stützle led the way with 3 points (2 G, 1 A). N. Deslauriers had 5 shots on goal against our projection of 0.8. A. Forsberg stopped 29 of 32.

Scoring

1st2nd3rdOTT
PHI02103
OTT01214
  1. 2nd 11:43PHIN. Deslauriers0.73 xG
  2. 2nd 12:36OTTT. Stützle0.24 xG
  3. 2nd 17:17PHIN. Cates0.07 xG
  4. 3rd 4:41OTTF. Zetterlund0.16 xG
  5. 3rd 7:33PHIG. Hathaway0.03 xG
  6. 3rd 12:54OTTT. Chabot0.07 xG
  7. OT 1:40OTTT. StützlePP0.10 xG

Team Stats

PHIOTT
32Shots on goal25
3.70Expected goals2.00
54Shot attempts67
275v5 shots on goal21
0/2Power play1/3
28Hits29
23Blocked shots14
8Penalty minutes4
16Giveaways7
4Takeaways3

Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.

Expected Goals Over the Game

PHI 3.70 xGOTT 2.00 xGGoal

00.511.522.533.541st2nd3rdOTPHI goal, 11:43OTT goal, 12:36PHI goal, 17:17OTT goal, 4:41PHI goal, 7:33OTT goal, 12:54OTT goal, 1:40

Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.

Shot Map

PHI32 on goal, 3 scored
OTT25 on goal, 4 scored

GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance

Box Score

PHI Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
G. HathawayRW112143+1012:350:08
N. CatesLW1013010017:161:31
B. BrinkRW0111000015:222:47
N. DeslauriersLW101531+1011:210:08
T. KonecnyRW000330-1017:312:11
R. PoehlingC0002010017:261:14
O. TippettRW0003200016:481:22
S. CouturierC000420-1216:201:51
M. MichkovRW000401-1215:502:34
T. FoersterRW0001100215:422:04
J. PelletierLW0001210013:280:55
K. DorwartLW000110+1012:150:20
N. SeelerD0110030023:320:00
C. YorkD0110330022:550:14
E. AndraeD0112220013:220:00
T. SanheimD0000230223:220:00
J. DrysdaleD0001220020:230:54
E. ZamulaD0000120013:320:12
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
I. Fedotov25214.84061:40OT loss
S. Ersson000–0:00

OTT Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
T. StützleC213221+2020:303:32
D. BathersonRW011220+2019:283:27
S. PintoC011011+1019:231:35
C. GirouxRW011112-2017:193:30
F. ZetterlundLW101311-1014:411:33
A. CrookshankC011030+1011:250:00
D. CozensC000110-2016:082:08
M. AmadioRW000140+1214:471:30
N. CousinsC0002300013:280:00
A. GaudetteRW000000-1213:181:32
M. HighmoreC0001100011:430:00
H. HodgsonRW000231-109:540:00
T. ChabotD123200+2020:171:36
T. HamonicD0110110016:540:00
J. SandersonD0005010024:373:26
A. ZubD0000120019:340:00
D. GilbertD0003340018:390:00
T. KlevenD000020-2018:160:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
A. Forsberg32293.90661:40Win
L. Ullmark000–0:00

Storylines That Played Out

  • Old teamSamuel Ersson OTT Faces PHI, his team until May 20260 saves on 0

As Tonight had them before puck drop, with what each player did.

How We Did

We projectedIt finished
ScorePHI 2.8, OTT 3.5PHI 3, OTT 4
Total goals6.37
Shots on goalPHI 26.8, OTT 28.6PHI 32, OTT 25
Win chanceOTT 62%OTT won

Players

PlayerSOG projectedSOGPoints projectedPointsGoal chanceGoals
PHI M. Michkov2.940.76025%0
PHI S. Couturier2.340.54017%0
OTT J. Sanderson2.350.73013%0
PHI T. Konecny2.330.78027%0
OTT D. Batherson2.320.84127%0
OTT D. Cozens2.310.69024%0
PHI O. Tippett2.230.46020%0
OTT T. Chabot2.120.66314%1
OTT F. Zetterlund2.030.52121%1
PHI T. Foerster2.010.51025%0
OTT T. Stützle1.920.95327%2
OTT S. Pinto1.800.60125%0
PHI T. Sanheim1.600.3709%0
PHI N. Cates1.530.43116%1
OTT C. Giroux1.510.67122%0
PHI N. Seeler1.400.2514%0
PHI R. Poehling1.420.42016%0
PHI B. Brink1.410.45115%0
OTT T. Hamonic1.300.2216%0
OTT M. Amadio1.310.48021%0
PHI J. Pelletier1.210.31012%0
OTT A. Crookshank1.200.21111%0
OTT N. Cousins1.220.29011%0
PHI G. Hathaway1.210.23211%1
PHI J. Drysdale1.110.2706%0
OTT A. Zub1.100.3407%0
OTT A. Gaudette1.000.28015%0
OTT H. Hodgson1.020.33012%0
PHI C. York1.000.2316%0
OTT T. Kleven1.000.1806%0
PHI E. Andrae0.920.1213%0
OTT M. Highmore0.910.2309%0
PHI N. Deslauriers0.850.0916%1
PHI E. Zamula0.700.2305%0
OTT D. Gilbert0.430.2003%0

Shots on goal: 19 of 35 players within one of their projection; they took 0.1 more than projected on average.

Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.