OTT beat PHI 4-3 in overtime despite fewer good chances: 2.00 expected goals to 3.70. T. Stützle led the way with 3 points (2 G, 1 A). N. Deslauriers had 5 shots on goal against our projection of 0.8. A. Forsberg stopped 29 of 32.
Scoring
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | OT | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHI | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| OTT | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
- 2nd 11:43PHIN. Deslauriers0.73 xG
- 2nd 12:36OTTT. Stützle0.24 xG
- 2nd 17:17PHIN. Cates0.07 xG
- 3rd 4:41OTTF. Zetterlund0.16 xG
- 3rd 7:33PHIG. Hathaway0.03 xG
- 3rd 12:54OTTT. Chabot0.07 xG
- OT 1:40OTTT. StützlePP0.10 xG
Team Stats
Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.
Expected Goals Over the Game
PHI 3.70 xGOTT 2.00 xGGoal
Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.
Shot Map
GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance
Box Score
PHI Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G. Hathaway | RW | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 3 | +1 | 0 | 12:35 | 0:08 |
| N. Cates | LW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 17:16 | 1:31 |
| B. Brink | RW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15:22 | 2:47 |
| N. Deslauriers | LW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 11:21 | 0:08 |
| T. Konecny | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 17:31 | 2:11 |
| R. Poehling | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 17:26 | 1:14 |
| O. Tippett | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16:48 | 1:22 |
| S. Couturier | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 0 | -1 | 2 | 16:20 | 1:51 |
| M. Michkov | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 2 | 15:50 | 2:34 |
| T. Foerster | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 15:42 | 2:04 |
| J. Pelletier | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 13:28 | 0:55 |
| K. Dorwart | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 12:15 | 0:20 |
| N. Seeler | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 23:32 | 0:00 |
| C. York | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 22:55 | 0:14 |
| E. Andrae | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 13:22 | 0:00 |
| T. Sanheim | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 23:22 | 0:00 |
| J. Drysdale | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 20:23 | 0:54 |
| E. Zamula | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 13:32 | 0:12 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I. Fedotov | 25 | 21 | 4 | .840 | 61:40 | OT loss |
| S. Ersson | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
OTT Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T. Stützle | C | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | +2 | 0 | 20:30 | 3:32 |
| D. Batherson | RW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | +2 | 0 | 19:28 | 3:27 |
| S. Pinto | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 19:23 | 1:35 |
| C. Giroux | RW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -2 | 0 | 17:19 | 3:30 |
| F. Zetterlund | LW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 14:41 | 1:33 |
| A. Crookshank | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 11:25 | 0:00 |
| D. Cozens | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 16:08 | 2:08 |
| M. Amadio | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | +1 | 2 | 14:47 | 1:30 |
| N. Cousins | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13:28 | 0:00 |
| A. Gaudette | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 2 | 13:18 | 1:32 |
| M. Highmore | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11:43 | 0:00 |
| H. Hodgson | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 9:54 | 0:00 |
| T. Chabot | D | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | +2 | 0 | 20:17 | 1:36 |
| T. Hamonic | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 16:54 | 0:00 |
| J. Sanderson | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 24:37 | 3:26 |
| A. Zub | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 19:34 | 0:00 |
| D. Gilbert | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 18:39 | 0:00 |
| T. Kleven | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 18:16 | 0:00 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A. Forsberg | 32 | 29 | 3 | .906 | 61:40 | Win |
| L. Ullmark | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
Storylines That Played Out
As Tonight had them before puck drop, with what each player did.
How We Did
| We projected | It finished | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | PHI 2.8, OTT 3.5 | PHI 3, OTT 4 |
| Total goals | 6.3 | 7 |
| Shots on goal | PHI 26.8, OTT 28.6 | PHI 32, OTT 25 |
| Win chance | OTT 62% | OTT won |
Players
| Player | SOG projected | SOG | Points projected | Points | Goal chance | Goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHI M. Michkov | 2.9 | 4 | 0.76 | 0 | 25% | 0 |
| PHI S. Couturier | 2.3 | 4 | 0.54 | 0 | 17% | 0 |
| OTT J. Sanderson | 2.3 | 5 | 0.73 | 0 | 13% | 0 |
| PHI T. Konecny | 2.3 | 3 | 0.78 | 0 | 27% | 0 |
| OTT D. Batherson | 2.3 | 2 | 0.84 | 1 | 27% | 0 |
| OTT D. Cozens | 2.3 | 1 | 0.69 | 0 | 24% | 0 |
| PHI O. Tippett | 2.2 | 3 | 0.46 | 0 | 20% | 0 |
| OTT T. Chabot | 2.1 | 2 | 0.66 | 3 | 14% | 1 |
| OTT F. Zetterlund | 2.0 | 3 | 0.52 | 1 | 21% | 1 |
| PHI T. Foerster | 2.0 | 1 | 0.51 | 0 | 25% | 0 |
| OTT T. Stützle | 1.9 | 2 | 0.95 | 3 | 27% | 2 |
| OTT S. Pinto | 1.8 | 0 | 0.60 | 1 | 25% | 0 |
| PHI T. Sanheim | 1.6 | 0 | 0.37 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
| PHI N. Cates | 1.5 | 3 | 0.43 | 1 | 16% | 1 |
| OTT C. Giroux | 1.5 | 1 | 0.67 | 1 | 22% | 0 |
| PHI N. Seeler | 1.4 | 0 | 0.25 | 1 | 4% | 0 |
| PHI R. Poehling | 1.4 | 2 | 0.42 | 0 | 16% | 0 |
| PHI B. Brink | 1.4 | 1 | 0.45 | 1 | 15% | 0 |
| OTT T. Hamonic | 1.3 | 0 | 0.22 | 1 | 6% | 0 |
| OTT M. Amadio | 1.3 | 1 | 0.48 | 0 | 21% | 0 |
| PHI J. Pelletier | 1.2 | 1 | 0.31 | 0 | 12% | 0 |
| OTT A. Crookshank | 1.2 | 0 | 0.21 | 1 | 11% | 0 |
| OTT N. Cousins | 1.2 | 2 | 0.29 | 0 | 11% | 0 |
| PHI G. Hathaway | 1.2 | 1 | 0.23 | 2 | 11% | 1 |
| PHI J. Drysdale | 1.1 | 1 | 0.27 | 0 | 6% | 0 |
| OTT A. Zub | 1.1 | 0 | 0.34 | 0 | 7% | 0 |
| OTT A. Gaudette | 1.0 | 0 | 0.28 | 0 | 15% | 0 |
| OTT H. Hodgson | 1.0 | 2 | 0.33 | 0 | 12% | 0 |
| PHI C. York | 1.0 | 0 | 0.23 | 1 | 6% | 0 |
| OTT T. Kleven | 1.0 | 0 | 0.18 | 0 | 6% | 0 |
| PHI E. Andrae | 0.9 | 2 | 0.12 | 1 | 3% | 0 |
| OTT M. Highmore | 0.9 | 1 | 0.23 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
| PHI N. Deslauriers | 0.8 | 5 | 0.09 | 1 | 6% | 1 |
| PHI E. Zamula | 0.7 | 0 | 0.23 | 0 | 5% | 0 |
| OTT D. Gilbert | 0.4 | 3 | 0.20 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
Shots on goal: 19 of 35 players within one of their projection; they took 0.1 more than projected on average.
Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.