TOR beat PHI 3-2 despite fewer good chances: 1.88 expected goals to 3.58. PHI outshot TOR 32 to 17. T. Konecny led the way with 2 points (2 G, 0 A). M. Michkov had 8 shots on goal against our projection of 1.7. J. Woll stopped 30 of 32.
Scoring
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOR | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| PHI | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
- 1st 8:19PHIT. Konecny0.07 xG
- 2nd 1:19TORJ. TavaresPP0.07 xG
- 2nd 7:14PHIT. Konecny0.16 xG
- 2nd 7:55TORA. Matthews0.21 xG
- 3rd 13:21TORM. Knies0.09 xG
Team Stats
Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.
Expected Goals Over the Game
TOR 1.88 xGPHI 3.58 xGGoal
Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.
Shot Map
GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance
Box Score
TOR Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M. Marner | RW | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | +2 | 2 | 22:59 | 4:06 |
| A. Matthews | C | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | +1 | 0 | 20:51 | 4:05 |
| J. Tavares | C | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 16:45 | 3:35 |
| M. Knies | LW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | +1 | 2 | 18:09 | 2:53 |
| W. Nylander | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 18:54 | 4:38 |
| B. McMann | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | -2 | 0 | 15:37 | 1:28 |
| M. Domi | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14:56 | 1:27 |
| S. Lorentz | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 13:20 | 0:00 |
| M. Pacioretty | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 12:37 | 0:00 |
| D. Kampf | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 2 | 10:28 | 0:00 |
| C. Dewar | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 7:23 | 0:00 |
| R. Reaves | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 6:52 | 0:00 |
| M. Rielly | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 20:38 | 2:32 |
| P. Myers | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 | +1 | 0 | 18:26 | 0:00 |
| O. Ekman-Larsson | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 2 | +1 | 0 | 24:35 | 2:05 |
| C. Tanev | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21:21 | 0:07 |
| S. Benoit | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 16:43 | 0:00 |
| C. Timmins | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 12:38 | 0:49 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J. Woll | 32 | 30 | 2 | .938 | 60:00 | Win |
| D. Hildeby | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
PHI Skaters
| Player | Pos | G | A | P | SOG | HIT | BLK | +/- | PIM | TOI | PP TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T. Konecny | RW | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 2 | +2 | 0 | 21:00 | 1:55 |
| N. Cates | LW | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 19:53 | 3:30 |
| S. Couturier | C | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 10:43 | 0:19 |
| O. Tippett | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 19:37 | 2:03 |
| T. Foerster | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | -2 | 2 | 16:09 | 2:49 |
| B. Brink | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 16:04 | 3:07 |
| R. Poehling | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14:56 | 0:00 |
| M. Michkov | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14:27 | 3:56 |
| S. Laughton | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 12:43 | 0:00 |
| M. Frost | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12:36 | 1:17 |
| J. Farabee | LW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 11:54 | 2:07 |
| G. Hathaway | RW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | +1 | 0 | 10:54 | 0:10 |
| C. York | D | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 19:57 | 0:02 |
| T. Sanheim | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | -1 | 0 | 23:15 | 0:13 |
| R. Ristolainen | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 22:17 | 2:28 |
| J. Drysdale | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 17:49 | 2:44 |
| E. Zamula | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | +1 | 0 | 15:29 | 0:00 |
| N. Seeler | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 15:02 | 0:00 |
| Goalie | SA | SV | GA | SV% | TOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I. Fedotov | 17 | 14 | 3 | .824 | 58:07 | Loss |
| A. Kolosov | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0:00 |
Storylines That Played Out
As Tonight had them before puck drop, with what each player did.
How We Did
| We projected | It finished | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | TOR 3.3, PHI 3.0 | TOR 3, PHI 2 |
| Total goals | 6.3 | 5 |
| Shots on goal | TOR 26.4, PHI 30.4 | TOR 17, PHI 32 |
| Win chance | TOR 54% | TOR won |
Players
| Player | SOG projected | SOG | Points projected | Points | Goal chance | Goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOR A. Matthews | 3.6 | 1 | 1.17 | 2 | 45% | 1 |
| TOR W. Nylander | 2.9 | 0 | 1.05 | 0 | 37% | 0 |
| PHI O. Tippett | 2.9 | 2 | 0.64 | 0 | 26% | 0 |
| TOR J. Tavares | 2.7 | 2 | 0.90 | 2 | 32% | 1 |
| PHI T. Konecny | 2.5 | 6 | 0.90 | 2 | 32% | 2 |
| TOR B. McMann | 2.1 | 0 | 0.50 | 0 | 25% | 0 |
| TOR M. Marner | 2.1 | 2 | 1.27 | 2 | 31% | 0 |
| TOR M. Pacioretty | 1.8 | 1 | 0.54 | 0 | 20% | 0 |
| PHI J. Farabee | 1.8 | 0 | 0.43 | 0 | 18% | 0 |
| PHI T. Foerster | 1.8 | 2 | 0.47 | 0 | 23% | 0 |
| TOR M. Knies | 1.7 | 1 | 0.66 | 1 | 27% | 1 |
| PHI S. Laughton | 1.7 | 1 | 0.46 | 0 | 16% | 0 |
| PHI M. Michkov | 1.7 | 8 | 0.62 | 0 | 21% | 0 |
| PHI S. Couturier | 1.7 | 0 | 0.42 | 1 | 14% | 0 |
| TOR M. Rielly | 1.7 | 0 | 0.71 | 1 | 11% | 0 |
| PHI T. Sanheim | 1.6 | 2 | 0.44 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
| PHI B. Brink | 1.6 | 0 | 0.49 | 0 | 16% | 0 |
| PHI M. Frost | 1.6 | 4 | 0.49 | 0 | 16% | 0 |
| PHI R. Ristolainen | 1.5 | 2 | 0.27 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| TOR M. Domi | 1.4 | 3 | 0.54 | 0 | 14% | 0 |
| PHI N. Cates | 1.4 | 1 | 0.45 | 1 | 16% | 0 |
| TOR O. Ekman-Larsson | 1.3 | 4 | 0.42 | 0 | 7% | 0 |
| TOR P. Myers | 1.3 | 0 | 0.23 | 1 | 5% | 0 |
| PHI N. Seeler | 1.2 | 0 | 0.22 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| PHI C. York | 1.2 | 0 | 0.33 | 1 | 8% | 0 |
| PHI J. Drysdale | 1.2 | 0 | 0.28 | 0 | 5% | 0 |
| PHI R. Poehling | 1.2 | 2 | 0.35 | 0 | 13% | 0 |
| PHI G. Hathaway | 1.1 | 2 | 0.24 | 0 | 11% | 0 |
| TOR D. Kampf | 1.0 | 0 | 0.29 | 0 | 11% | 0 |
| TOR C. Dewar | 0.9 | 0 | 0.22 | 0 | 9% | 0 |
| TOR C. Timmins | 0.9 | 0 | 0.34 | 0 | 5% | 0 |
| PHI E. Zamula | 0.8 | 0 | 0.31 | 0 | 6% | 0 |
| TOR S. Lorentz | 0.8 | 2 | 0.19 | 0 | 10% | 0 |
| TOR S. Benoit | 0.7 | 1 | 0.12 | 0 | 3% | 0 |
| TOR C. Tanev | 0.6 | 0 | 0.30 | 0 | 4% | 0 |
| TOR R. Reaves | 0.5 | 0 | 0.14 | 0 | 6% | 0 |
Shots on goal: 18 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.2 fewer than projected on average.
Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.