Go ad-free AND support the site for the 26-27 season for just $18. Sign up now!
Game Recap
PIT1
FinalTue, Feb 25, 2025Every game that night
PHI6

PHI beat PIT 6-1, with the chances close: 3.29 expected goals to 3.06. PHI outshot PIT 38 to 24. B. Brink led the way with 4 points (1 G, 3 A). M. Michkov had 7 shots on goal against our projection of 2.1. S. Ersson stopped 23 of 24.

Scoring

1st2nd3rdT
PIT0101
PHI2316
  1. 1st 3:56PHIR. Ristolainen0.05 xG
  2. 1st 12:19PHIN. Cates0.07 xG
  3. 2nd 6:09PITP. Tomasino0.18 xG
  4. 2nd 11:55PHIT. Foerster0.10 xG
  5. 2nd 18:55PHIN. Cates0.22 xG
  6. 2nd 19:05PHIB. Brink0.39 xG
  7. 3rd 6:06PHIO. Tippett0.08 xG

Team Stats

PITPHI
24Shots on goal38
3.06Expected goals3.29
48Shot attempts57
215v5 shots on goal28
0/2Power play0/3
19Hits14
9Blocked shots15
6Penalty minutes4
20Giveaways14
4Takeaways4

Expected goals: the chance each unblocked shot had of going in, by our model, added up.

Expected Goals Over the Game

PIT 3.06 xGPHI 3.29 xGGoal

00.511.522.533.51st2nd3rdPHI goal, 3:56PHI goal, 12:19PIT goal, 6:09PHI goal, 11:55PHI goal, 18:55PHI goal, 19:05PHI goal, 6:06

Each step up is a shot: how likely it was to go in. A team well above the other had the better chances, whatever the score.

Shot Map

PIT22 on goal, 1 scored
PHI38 on goal, 6 scored

GoalSavedMissedBlockedBigger: a better chance

Box Score

PIT Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
M. BuntingLW0111000013:171:59
P. TomasinoRW1011100012:291:51
S. CrosbyC000211-2019:262:10
B. RustRW000210-2218:522:02
R. RakellRW000220-2018:091:21
E. MalkinC000010-2015:062:39
A. BeauvillierRW000300-2214:190:00
C. GlassC0001010014:030:00
N. AcciariC000010-1013:260:00
K. HayesRW0002000012:572:00
B. LizotteC000111-1012:140:00
D. HeinenLW000030-3011:020:00
K. LetangD011020-1222:461:59
E. KarlssonD000210-3021:131:50
P. JosephD000201-4019:260:00
V. DesharnaisD000323-1019:030:00
R. SheaD0001110018:240:08
M. GrzelcykD000121-1017:482:01
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
A. Nedeljkovic38326.84260:00Loss
J. Blomqvist000–0:00

PHI Skaters

PlayerPosGAPSOGHITBLK+/-PIMTOIPP TOI
B. BrinkRW134400+4016:102:37
T. FoersterRW123201+3016:012:48
N. CatesLW213310+4015:582:14
M. MichkovRW022702+2017:072:52
O. TippettRW101412+2014:322:41
S. CouturierC011100+2013:510:00
J. PelletierLW011220+1012:000:29
T. KonecnyRW000401-1016:482:43
S. LaughtonC000310-1016:462:40
A. KuzmenkoLW000200-1016:182:45
R. PoehlingC0001010013:220:38
G. HathawayRW0003400211:440:32
R. RistolainenD101111+1019:323:06
E. ZamulaD011001+1017:190:00
J. DrysdaleD011000+3016:532:24
C. YorkD000012+1023:080:58
T. SanheimD000102+2022:210:33
N. SeelerD000032+2216:100:00
GoalieSASVGASV%TOI
S. Ersson24231.95860:00Win
I. Fedotov000–0:00

Storylines That Played Out

  • Old teamNoel Acciari PHI Faces PIT, his team until Apr 20260 SOG

As Tonight had them before puck drop, with what each player did.

How We Did

We projectedIt finished
ScorePIT 2.8, PHI 2.8PIT 1, PHI 6
Total goals5.67
Shots on goalPIT 26.3, PHI 27.8PIT 24, PHI 38
Win chancePIT 51%PHI won

Players

PlayerSOG projectedSOGPoints projectedPointsGoal chanceGoals
PIT S. Crosby2.921.13034%0
PIT R. Rakell2.720.80030%0
PIT B. Rust2.520.83031%0
PHI T. Konecny2.541.05033%0
PIT E. Karlsson2.520.85017%0
PHI O. Tippett2.540.59124%1
PHI M. Michkov2.170.70223%0
PIT K. Hayes2.120.48019%0
PIT A. Beauvillier2.030.40017%0
PHI S. Laughton2.030.58019%0
PHI T. Foerster2.020.56326%1
PIT K. Letang2.000.57114%0
PIT M. Bunting1.910.59122%0
PHI S. Couturier1.910.51115%0
PHI T. Sanheim1.910.52011%0
PHI N. Cates1.730.53319%2
PIT C. Glass1.610.37014%0
PHI B. Brink1.640.51417%1
PHI R. Ristolainen1.510.3115%1
PHI A. Kuzmenko1.520.71027%0
PHI C. York1.500.3809%0
PIT P. Tomasino1.510.44115%1
PIT E. Malkin1.500.63021%0
PHI N. Seeler1.400.2505%0
PHI J. Pelletier1.420.40114%0
PHI J. Drysdale1.400.3416%0
PHI G. Hathaway1.330.31013%0
PIT D. Heinen1.200.41017%0
PIT P. Joseph1.120.2305%0
PHI R. Poehling1.010.32012%0
PIT B. Lizotte1.010.30014%0
PIT N. Acciari1.000.18011%0
PIT M. Grzelcyk1.010.3404%0
PHI E. Zamula0.900.3517%0
PIT R. Shea0.610.1507%0
PIT V. Desharnais0.530.1302%0

Shots on goal: 22 of 36 players within one of their projection; they took 0.1 more than projected on average.

Our projections as they stood at puck drop. One game says little about a model; Model Notes has how it tests over thousands.