Go ad-free AND support the site for the 26-27 season for just $18. Sign up now!
NHL Scores and Recaps

14 games

BUF1
OTT4
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
BUF0101
OTT0134
2.21Expected goals4.18
22Shots on goal24
46Shot attempts52
  1. R. Greig OTT1 G, 1 A, 1 SOG
  2. D. Cozens OTT1 G, 6 SOG
  3. L. Eller OTT1 G, 3 SOG

L. Ullmark OTT21 saves on 22, the win

We had OTT at 55% to win, and they did. Shots on goal: 21 of 35 players within one of their projection.

PIT3
TBL6
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
PIT2013
TBL1326
2.00Expected goals4.94
24Shots on goal33
46Shot attempts66
  1. A. Cirelli TBL3 G, 3 SOG
  2. N. Kucherov TBL1 G, 2 A, 4 SOG
  3. E. Chinakhov PIT2 G, 4 SOG

A. Vasilevskiy TBL21 saves on 24, the win

We had TBL at 59% to win, and they did. Shots on goal: 23 of 36 players within one of their projection.

BOS1
FLA2
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
BOS1001
FLA2002
2.99Expected goals3.89
29Shots on goal24
68Shot attempts57
  1. S. Bennett FLA1 G, 7 SOG
  2. M. Samoskevich FLA1 G, 2 SOG
  3. F. Minten BOS1 G, 2 SOG

S. Bobrovsky FLA28 saves on 29, the win

We had BOS at 51% to win; FLA won. Shots on goal: 22 of 35 players within one of their projection.

MTL3
NYR2
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
MTL0213
NYR0022
3.36Expected goals2.73
25Shots on goal24
44Shot attempts56
  1. C. Caufield MTL2 G, 7 SOG
  2. N. Suzuki MTL2 A, 1 SOG
  3. W. Cuylle NYR1 G, 6 SOG

J. Fowler MTL22 saves on 24, the win

We had MTL at 52% to win, and they did. Shots on goal: 20 of 34 players within one of their projection.

DET4
PHI2
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
DET1124
PHI0112
1.99Expected goals3.83
19Shots on goal34
38Shot attempts72
  1. P. Kane DET1 G, 2 A, 1 SOG
  2. A. DeBrincat DET2 G, 4 SOG
  3. A. Copp DET2 A, 0 SOG

J. Gibson DET32 saves on 34, the win

We had DET at 51% to win, and they did. Shots on goal: 14 of 35 players within one of their projection.

CBJ1
CAR5
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
CBJ0101
CAR3115
1.57Expected goals2.07
10Shots on goal21
46Shot attempts52
  1. L. Stankoven CAR2 G, 4 SOG
  2. T. Hall CAR2 A, 1 SOG
  3. S. Aho CAR2 A, 1 SOG

F. Andersen CAR9 saves on 10, the win

We had CAR at 62% to win, and they did. Shots on goal: 13 of 36 players within one of their projection.

WSH3
NJD7
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
WSH2013
NJD3137
3.33Expected goals3.70
32Shots on goal30
67Shot attempts55
  1. J. Hughes NJD2 G, 3 A, 5 SOG
  2. J. Bratt NJD1 G, 4 A, 2 SOG
  3. D. Mercer NJD2 G, 6 SOG

J. Allen NJD29 saves on 32, the win

We had NJD at 52% to win, and they did. Shots on goal: 21 of 36 players within one of their projection.

WPG0
DAL3
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
WPG0000
DAL2103
2.17Expected goals2.81
22Shots on goal21
52Shot attempts42
  1. A. Erne DAL1 G, 1 A, 1 SOG
  2. A. Hyry DAL1 G, 1 A, 1 SOG
  3. M. Duchene DAL1 G, 1 SOG

J. Oettinger DAL22 saves on 22, the win

We had DAL at 57% to win, and they did. Shots on goal: 24 of 36 players within one of their projection.

VAN2
MIN5
Final
3.14Expected goals3.70
32Shots on goal39
65Shot attempts63
  1. M. Boldy MIN2 G, 1 A, 6 SOG
  2. R. Hartman MIN2 G, 5 SOG
  3. K. Kaprizov MIN1 G, 1 A, 5 SOG

F. Gustavsson MIN30 saves on 32, the win

We had MIN at 70% to win, and they did. Shots on goal: 17 of 35 players within one of their projection.

CHI1
EDM3
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
CHI0011
EDM0213
3.08Expected goals4.68
18Shots on goal38
58Shot attempts69
  1. M. Savoie EDM1 G, 5 SOG
  2. V. Podkolzin EDM1 G, 3 SOG
  3. N. Lardis CHI1 G, 3 SOG

T. Jarry EDM17 saves on 18, the win

We had EDM at 68% to win, and they did. Shots on goal: 18 of 35 players within one of their projection.

CGY3
VGK3
Final
2.13Expected goals3.18
19Shots on goal28
36Shot attempts69
  1. M. Marner VGK2 G, 1 A, 4 SOG
  2. B. Coleman CGY2 G, 2 SOG
  3. P. Dorofeyev VGK1 G, 5 SOG

We had VGK at 65% to win; CGY won. Shots on goal: 28 of 36 players within one of their projection.

TOR1
SJS3
Final
2.12Expected goals3.05
18Shots on goal24
54Shot attempts57
  1. W. Eklund SJS1 G, 3 SOG
  2. C. Graf SJS1 G, 2 SOG
  3. J. Tavares TOR1 G, 1 SOG

We had TOR at 54% to win; SJS won. Shots on goal: 18 of 36 players within one of their projection.

UTA3
SEA2
Final
4.21Expected goals2.28
21Shots on goal20
62Shot attempts51
  1. L. Cooley UTA2 G, 3 SOG
  2. N. Schmaltz UTA1 G, 1 A, 3 SOG
  3. D. Guenther UTA2 A, 1 SOG

We had UTA at 53% to win, and they did. Shots on goal: 20 of 36 players within one of their projection.

NSH4
LAK1
Final
3.95Expected goals3.24
25Shots on goal15
71Shot attempts67
  1. J. Marchessault NSH1 G, 1 A, 2 SOG
  2. S. Stamkos NSH1 G, 3 SOG
  3. A. Kempe LAK1 G, 3 SOG

We had LAK at 54% to win; NSH won. Shots on goal: 23 of 36 players within one of their projection.