Go ad-free AND support the site for the 26-27 season for just $18. Sign up now!
NHL Scores and Recaps

15 games

PHI3
NJD1
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
PHI0123
NJD1001
2.80Expected goals1.53
18Shots on goal13
59Shot attempts64
  1. N. Cates PHI2 A, 2 SOG
  2. T. Foerster PHI2 A, 0 SOG
  3. D. Hamilton NJD1 G, 2 SOG

S. Ersson PHI12 saves on 13, the win

We had NJD at 59% to win; PHI won. Shots on goal: 21 of 35 players within one of their projection.

BOS5
OTT6
Final/SO
Team1st2nd3rdSOT
BOS22105
OTT21216
2.63Expected goals4.33
28Shots on goal44
50Shot attempts95
  1. D. Pastrnak BOS1 G, 2 A, 6 SOG
  2. J. Norris OTT2 G, 3 SOG
  3. T. Stützle OTT1 G, 1 A, 3 SOG

L. Meriläinen OTT23 saves on 28, the win

We had OTT at 50% to win, and they did. Shots on goal: 16 of 36 players within one of their projection.

DAL3
COL6
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
DAL1023
COL1326
2.38Expected goals3.35
29Shots on goal36
64Shot attempts80
  1. A. Lehkonen COL2 G, 2 A, 4 SOG
  2. J. Robertson DAL2 G, 1 A, 6 SOG
  3. J. Drouin COL1 G, 2 A, 5 SOG

S. Wedgewood COL26 saves on 29, the win

We had DAL at 51% to win; COL won. Shots on goal: 22 of 35 players within one of their projection.

ANA0
FLA3
Final
2.14Expected goals3.67
34Shots on goal45
59Shot attempts75
  1. G. Forsling FLA1 G, 5 SOG
  2. J. Boqvist FLA1 G, 2 SOG
  3. A. Lundell FLA1 G, 2 SOG

S. Knight FLA34 saves on 34, the win

We had FLA at 67% to win, and they did. Shots on goal: 17 of 36 players within one of their projection.

TOR7
MTL3
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
TOR0257
MTL3003
3.63Expected goals3.81
34Shots on goal35
63Shot attempts69
  1. O. Ekman-Larsson TOR1 G, 2 A, 2 SOG
  2. B. McMann TOR1 G, 1 A, 5 SOG
  3. P. Laine MTL1 G, 1 A, 2 SOG

J. Woll TOR32 saves on 35, the win

We had TOR at 53% to win, and they did. Shots on goal: 16 of 36 players within one of their projection.

DET1
TBL5
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
DET0101
TBL1405
2.60Expected goals2.87
39Shots on goal22
76Shot attempts43
  1. N. Kucherov TBL1 G, 2 A, 2 SOG
  2. J. Guentzel TBL1 G, 2 A, 1 SOG
  3. D. Raddysh TBL1 G, 1 A, 4 SOG

A. Vasilevskiy TBL38 saves on 39, the win

We had TBL at 61% to win, and they did. Shots on goal: 20 of 36 players within one of their projection.

PIT1
WSH4
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
PIT0011
WSH1124
2.05Expected goals4.42
19Shots on goal32
56Shot attempts56
  1. P. Dubois WSH1 G, 1 A, 3 SOG
  2. A. Protas WSH1 G, 1 A, 1 SOG
  3. C. McMichael WSH2 A, 1 SOG

L. Thompson WSH18 saves on 19, the win

We had WSH at 63% to win, and they did. Shots on goal: 18 of 35 players within one of their projection.

CGY3
WPG1
Final
1.28Expected goals3.94
22Shots on goal39
43Shot attempts84
  1. B. Coleman CGY1 G, 2 A, 4 SOG
  2. A. Lowry WPG1 G, 2 SOG
  3. M. Coronato CGY1 G, 2 SOG

D. Wolf CGY38 saves on 39, the win

We had WPG at 61% to win; CGY won. Shots on goal: 23 of 35 players within one of their projection.

SJS1
NYI4
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
SJS0101
NYI0314
1.36Expected goals3.44
19Shots on goal31
55Shot attempts73
  1. B. Nelson NYI1 G, 1 A, 4 SOG
  2. M. Barzal NYI1 G, 1 A, 3 SOG
  3. N. Dobson NYI1 G, 3 SOG

M. Hogberg NYI18 saves on 19, the win

We had NYI at 65% to win, and they did. Shots on goal: 23 of 35 players within one of their projection.

VGK3
CHI5
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
VGK1203
CHI3115
3.17Expected goals3.16
35Shots on goal23
77Shot attempts44
  1. T. Hertl VGK2 G, 1 A, 2 SOG
  2. S. Jones CHI1 G, 2 A, 3 SOG
  3. T. Bertuzzi CHI2 G, 4 SOG

P. Mrazek CHI32 saves on 35, the win

We had VGK at 65% to win; CHI won. Shots on goal: 24 of 36 players within one of their projection.

MIN2
NSH6
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
MIN1012
NSH2226
2.11Expected goals4.82
29Shots on goal38
52Shot attempts71
  1. F. Forsberg NSH2 G, 2 A, 8 SOG
  2. M. Boldy MIN1 G, 1 A, 6 SOG
  3. R. Josi NSH2 A, 3 SOG

J. Saros NSH27 saves on 29, the win

We had NSH at 54% to win, and they did. Shots on goal: 22 of 36 players within one of their projection.

STL2
UTA4
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
STL1102
UTA3104
2.31Expected goals2.53
24Shots on goal33
57Shot attempts50
  1. C. Keller UTA1 G, 3 A, 2 SOG
  2. L. Cooley UTA1 G, 2 A, 3 SOG
  3. M. Kesselring UTA1 G, 6 SOG

C. Ingram UTA22 saves on 24, the win

We had UTA at 50% to win, and they did. Shots on goal: 19 of 36 players within one of their projection.

EDM2
VAN3
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
EDM0202
VAN3003
1.44Expected goals1.97
15Shots on goal27
44Shot attempts53
  1. Q. Hughes VAN2 G, 5 SOG
  2. L. Draisaitl EDM2 G, 2 SOG
  3. J. Miller VAN2 A, 1 SOG

T. Demko VAN13 saves on 15, the win

We had EDM at 58% to win; VAN won. Shots on goal: 25 of 36 players within one of their projection.

LAK2
SEA4
Final
Team1st2nd3rdT
LAK2002
SEA2114
2.32Expected goals2.94
30Shots on goal22
76Shot attempts50
  1. J. Schwartz SEA3 G, 6 SOG
  2. K. Kakko SEA3 A, 2 SOG
  3. C. Stephenson SEA1 G, 2 SOG

J. Daccord SEA28 saves on 30, the win

We had LAK at 54% to win; SEA won. Shots on goal: 24 of 36 players within one of their projection.